Navalyze · Container · Ship

CONTAINERSHIPS VIII

IMO: 9336244
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,193 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Hamburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 22.51 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS "MIRA" GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,893 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

90.8

Container median 165 kg/nm (−45%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

58.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.4 (+200%)

Average speed

13.8 kn

Container median 13.2 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

30.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,798 t

CO₂ emitted

18,175 t

Distance sailed

63,841 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,632 h

193 days, 53% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 84.9 kg/nm · median 177 (−52%)

78.8Ranks 329 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.4 kn · median 13.3 (+1%)

9.1Faster than 51% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 51.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+216%)

7.22Ranks 2,040 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports65%
From the EU16%
Into the EU12%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,254 t

6.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CONTAINERSHIPS VIII
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CONTAINERSHIPS VIII
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CONTAINERSHIPS VIII
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.0 kn	−8%	−14%	−1%	−10%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.6 kn	+2%	+6%	−10%	−2%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	+3%	−4%	−15%	+13%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	−5%	−13%	−15%	+13%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.4 kn	−1%	+2%	−3%	−3%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	−1%	−6%	−10%	−7%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	+9%	+11%	+2%	+7%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MS "MIRA" GmbH & Co. KG	4,813	15,162	56,665	4,216	13.4	84.9	51.5	100%
2024	MS "MIRA" GmbH & Co. KG	5,289	16,580	57,241	3,986	14.4	92.4	57.1	–
2023	not published	5,798	18,175	63,841	4,632	13.8	90.8	58.2	–
2022	not published	6,676	20,877	75,474	5,160	14.6	88.5	51.6	–
2021	not published	8,277	25,857	88,854	5,552	16.0	93.2	45.8	–
2020	not published	8,641	26,984	91,980	5,890	15.6	93.9	47.1	–
2019	not published	9,738	30,395	102,137	6,270	16.3	95.3	50.5	–
2018	not published	8,728	27,239	99,825	6,226	16.0	87.4	47.0	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS "MIRA" GmbH & Co. KG	51.5	16.3	+216%	2,040 of 2,208	RINA	A
2024	MS "MIRA" GmbH & Co. KG	57.1	17.5	+226%	1,836 of 1,974	RINA	A
2023	not published	58.2	19.4	+200%	1,770 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	51.6	19.1	+170%	1,632 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	45.8	17.9	+156%	1,548 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	47.1	17.6	+168%	1,572 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	50.5	18.9	+167%	1,557 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	47.0	20.2	+132%	1,441 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.