Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

DARNIA

IMO: 9336464
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 31,113 t
Flag (estimated): Panama
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EEDI 6.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: DVINA GULF

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: PENINSULA ENERGY FZE

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 35,210 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

116

Chemical tanker median 90.2 kg/nm (+29%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

10.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.1 (−40%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

29.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,492 t

CO₂ emitted

10,914 t

Distance sailed

30,035 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,822 h

118 days, 32% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 117 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+47%)

52.8Ranks 1,367 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 11.1 (−2%)

8.8Faster than 45% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−22%)

7.93Ranks 480 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU27%
Into the EU53%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

538 t

4.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

DARNIA
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

DARNIA
Chemical tanker median

9.510.010.511.011.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

DARNIA
Chemical tanker median

10.012.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	+1%	+3%	−14%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	+16%	+16%	+23%	–	Same speed, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	−28%	−25%	−10%	–	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	+12%	+6%	+51%	+0%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	−0%	−5%	−44%	+3%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.7 kn	+5%	+22%	+164%	+14%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+2%	−6%	−60%	+9%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	PENINSULA ENERGY FZE	2,967	9,317	25,400	2,326	10.9	117	11.8	83%
2024	PENINSULA ENERGY FZE	3,446	10,846	29,681	2,779	10.7	116	11.5	–
2023	not published	2,400	7,552	24,043	2,233	10.8	99.8	–	40%
2022	not published	3,706	11,749	26,737	2,593	10.3	139	13.2	–
2021	not published	2,196	6,946	17,746	1,632	10.9	124	13.2	–
2020	not published	3,944	12,360	31,767	2,772	11.5	124	12.8	–
2019	not published	1,427	4,482	12,050	1,228	9.8	119	11.2	–
2018	not published	3,492	10,914	30,035	2,822	10.6	116	10.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	PENINSULA ENERGY FZE	11.8	15.0	−22%	480 of 1,460	Verifavia	B
2024	PENINSULA ENERGY FZE	11.5	16.7	−31%	358 of 1,274	Verifavia	B
2023	not published	–	–	–	–	ABS	B
2022	not published	13.2	16.1	−18%	495 of 1,409	DNV	C
2021	not published	13.2	16.7	−21%	422 of 1,343	DNV	C
2020	not published	12.8	16.2	−21%	396 of 1,312	DNV	C
2019	not published	11.2	17.3	−35%	262 of 1,321	DNV	C
2018	not published	10.3	17.1	−40%	188 of 1,294	DNV	A+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.