Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

AL GHARIYA

IMO: 9337987
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Bahamas
Port of registry: Nassau
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.13 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: NEPTORA Schiffsbetriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. TS "Julia“ KG

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

373

LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (+26%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

17.5

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (+63%)

Average speed

13.7 kn

LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

123.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

17,675 t

CO₂ emitted

54,930 t

Distance sailed

47,328 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,444 h

144 days, 39% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2024

Set against all 312 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 312 kg/nm · median 205 (+52%)

148Ranks 270 of 312, lowest first328

Average speedThis ship 16.2 kn · median 14.6 (+11%)

11.0Faster than 91% of LNG carrier ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 9.34 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.39 (+26%)

4.54Ranks 205 of 312, lowest first17.3

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU43%
Into the EU55%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

840 t

1.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AL GHARIYA
LNG carrier median

200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AL GHARIYA
LNG carrier median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

AL GHARIYA
LNG carrier median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	–	–	–	–	–
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	−5%	−4%	+83%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	−10%	−10%	+26%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.1 kn	+1%	+1%	+11%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	+2.3 kn	−3%	+13%	−41%	−26%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−2.8 kn	+0%	−17%	+86%	+29%	2.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+1.6 kn	+4%	+16%	−35%	+28%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	NEPTORA Schiffsbetriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. TS "Julia“ KG	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2024	NEPTORA Schiffsbetriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. TS "Julia“ KG	22,139	68,757	71,073	4,396	16.2	312	–	–
2023	not published	12,818	40,083	38,913	2,454	15.9	329	–	–
2022	not published	11,288	35,171	30,788	1,942	15.9	367	–	–
2021	not published	10,067	31,344	27,804	1,741	16.0	362	–	–
2020	not published	17,675	54,930	47,328	3,444	13.7	373	–	–
2019	not published	9,494	29,600	25,503	1,543	16.5	372	–	–
2018	not published	13,907	43,183	38,937	2,611	14.9	357	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	NEPTORA Schiffsbetriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. TS "Julia“ KG	–	–	–	–	DNV	B+C
2024	NEPTORA Schiffsbetriebsgesellschaft mbH & Co. TS "Julia“ KG	9.34	7.39	+26%	205 of 312	DNV	B+C
2023	not published	9.94	9.10	+9%	201 of 355	DNV	B+C
2022	not published	12.1	10.4	+16%	239 of 379	DNV	B+C
2021	not published	12.8	10.5	+23%	199 of 289	DNV	B+C
2020	not published	17.5	10.7	+63%	236 of 267	Lloyd's Register	C
2019	not published	13.6	10.9	+25%	177 of 248	Lloyd's Register	C
2018	not published	10.6	10.9	−3%	89 of 197	Lloyd's Register	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.