Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

EASTERLY AS OLIVIA

IMO: 9340489
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 12,299 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEDI 8.65 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: AS OLIVIA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: NORSTAR SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 12,299 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

71.6 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 80.8 kg/nm (−11%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

18.39

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.73 (+10%)

Average speed

12.0 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.0 kn (+9%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,633 t

CO₂ emitted

5,159 t

5,240 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

22,812 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,902 h

79 days, 22% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,274 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 71.6 kg/nm · median 80.8 (−11%)

53.8Ranks 443 of 1,274, lowest first110.8

Average speedThis ship 12.0 kn · median 11.0 (+9%)

8.7Faster than 80% of chemical tanker ships12.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.39 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.73 (+10%)

8.47Ranks 715 of 1,274, lowest first41.97

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports17%
From the EU24%
Into the EU60%
At berth in the EU0%

61% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,168 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

EASTERLY AS OLIVIA
Chemical tanker median

60.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

EASTERLY AS OLIVIA
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EASTERLY AS OLIVIA
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	+11%	+9%	+49%	+55%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	+3%	−6%	−20%	−43%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.8 kn	−6%	+0%	+387%	+73%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.3 kn	−8%	−6%	−82%	−18%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	−21%	−21%	+23%	−60%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.8 kn	+9%	+2%	+35%	+29%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	NORSTAR SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	1,633	5,159	22,812	1,902	12.0	71.6	18.39	–
2023	not published	992	3,141	15,352	1,258	12.2	64.6	11.89	88%
2022	not published	1,195	3,764	19,114	1,435	13.3	62.5	20.90	69%
2021	not published	262	816	3,926	314	12.5	66.6	12.07	79%
2020	not published	1,595	5,004	21,968	1,796	12.2	72.6	14.69	95%
2019	not published	1,649	5,191	17,890	1,478	12.1	92.2	36.50	44%
2018	not published	1,121	3,535	13,234	1,026	12.9	84.7	28.37	61%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	NORSTAR SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE LTD	18.39	16.73	+10%	715 of 1,274	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	11.89	16.23	−27%	353 of 1,314	ABS	–
2022	not published	20.90	16.06	+30%	926 of 1,409	ABS	–
2021	not published	12.07	16.69	−28%	340 of 1,343	ABS	–
2020	not published	14.69	16.16	−9%	548 of 1,312	Bureau Veritas	C
2019	not published	36.50	17.32	+111%	1,125 of 1,321	Bureau Veritas	C
2018	not published	28.37	17.14	+66%	1,002 of 1,294	Bureau Veritas	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.