Navalyze

Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ATLANTIC TWIN

IMO
9341328
Type
Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried
7,503 t
Flag (estimated)
Gibraltar
Port of registry
Gibraltar
Technical efficiency
EIV 13.38 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG

?
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,736 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
76.7
Chemical tanker median 88.3 kg/nm (−13%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
31.7
g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.3 (+83%)
Average speed
6.9 kn
Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (−32%)
Fuel per day at sea
12.8 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,363 t
CO₂ emitted
7,555 t
Distance sailed
30,807 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,445 h
185 days, 51% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 72.0 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−10%)
52.8Ranks 531 of 1,460, lowest first111
Average speedThis ship 10.0 kn · median 11.1 (−10%)
8.8Faster than 23% of chemical tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 30.3 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+102%)
7.93Ranks 1,181 of 1,460, lowest first40.2
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports77%
  • From the EU2%
  • Into the EU2%
  • At berth in the EU20%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,499 t
19.8% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • ATLANTIC TWIN
  • Chemical tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • ATLANTIC TWIN
  • Chemical tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • ATLANTIC TWIN
  • Chemical tanker median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.5 kn−4%−9%+0%−19%0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.7 kn−18%−11%+40%−6%0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023−1.0 kn+12%+1%−9%+13%1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+1.4 kn+13%+29%+8%−7%1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.7 kn−6%−12%−38%+0%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020+3.2 kn−1%+44%+11%+20%3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+1.4 kn−6%+19%+7%−15%1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG2,0926,61429,0732,91710.072.030.3–
2024Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG2,1716,83529,0022,76310.574.837.3–
2023not published1,8796,02320,7112,1239.890.739.7–
2022not published1,8455,91622,7922,11810.881.035.3–
2021not published1,5124,84821,1822,2439.471.438.0–
2020not published2,5998,33434,2043,38210.176.037.9–
2019not published2,3637,55530,8074,4456.976.731.7–
2018not published2,3617,55328,8895,2655.581.737.1–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmChemical tanker medianvs Chemical tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG30.315.0+102%1,181 of 1,460Swiss ClimateA
2024Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG37.316.7+123%1,091 of 1,274Swiss ClimateA
2023not published39.716.2+144%1,147 of 1,314Swiss ClimateA
2022not published35.316.1+119%1,208 of 1,409Swiss ClimateA
2021not published38.016.7+128%1,174 of 1,343Swiss ClimateA
2020not published37.916.2+135%1,155 of 1,312Swiss ClimateA
2019not published31.717.3+83%1,063 of 1,321Swiss ClimateA
2018not published37.117.1+116%1,101 of 1,294Swiss ClimateA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.