Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

AURORA ONE

IMO: 9343819
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 5,440 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.11 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: LILA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Aurora Shipping Ltd

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,440 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

55.5 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−33%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

32.40

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+311%)

Average speed

8.4 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−21%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,055 t

CO₂ emitted

3,352 t

3,404 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

19,018 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,270 h

95 days, 26% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 55.5 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−33%)

61.0Ranks 177 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 8.4 kn · median 10.7 (−21%)

8.8Faster than 8% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 32.40 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+311%)

4.80Ranks 3,487 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports28%
From the EU28%
Into the EU42%
At berth in the EU2%

65% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,177 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

AURORA ONE
Bulk carrier median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AURORA ONE
Bulk carrier median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AURORA ONE
Bulk carrier median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.3 kn	+24%	+20%	−14%	+62%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 24%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.5 kn	+10%	−7%	−23%	−1%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−1%	+8%	+78%	+13%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	−15%	−9%	−21%	+7%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.2 kn	−17%	−26%	−43%	–	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.9 kn	+22%	+73%	+17%	–	2.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 22%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−2.2 kn	−5%	−27%	−9%	+14%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Aurora Shipping Ltd	1,055	3,352	19,018	2,270	8.4	55.5	32.40	–
2024	Aurora Shipping Ltd	989	3,146	22,116	2,543	8.7	44.7	19.96	–
2023	not published	1,166	3,725	28,598	2,795	10.2	40.8	20.23	–
2022	not published	662	2,114	16,060	1,706	9.4	41.2	17.93	–
2021	not published	986	3,123	20,327	2,330	8.7	48.5	16.78	–
2020	not published	2,074	6,541	35,641	3,597	9.9	58.2	0.42	–
2019	not published	1,466	4,621	30,577	4,370	7.0	47.9	17.48	–
2018	not published	1,680	5,280	33,455	3,656	9.2	50.2	15.38	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Aurora Shipping Ltd	32.40	7.89	+311%	3,487 of 3,610	DNV	B
2024	Aurora Shipping Ltd	19.96	8.09	+147%	2,925 of 3,089	DNV	B
2023	not published	20.23	8.27	+145%	3,300 of 3,548	DNV	B
2022	not published	17.93	8.71	+106%	3,627 of 3,968	DNV	B
2021	not published	16.78	8.57	+96%	3,185 of 3,466	DNV	B
2020	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	A
2019	not published	17.48	8.38	+109%	3,125 of 3,360	Bureau Veritas	B
2018	not published	15.38	8.50	+81%	3,008 of 3,384	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.