Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

RUBIKON 202

IMO
9344423
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
8,379 t
Port of registry
Madeira
Technical efficiency
EIV 13.42 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA
Former names
PATARA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: 75. PHOENIX PCT UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “VENUS“

?
?

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,379 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
88.0 kg/nm
Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (−32%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
33.66
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (+323%)
Average speed
10.2 kn
Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−5%)
Fuel per day at sea
21.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
2,386 t
CO₂ emitted
7,649 t
7,766 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
27,119 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,651 h
110 days, 30% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 88.0 kg/nm · median 128.5 (−32%)
76.1Ranks 291 of 1,665, lowest first190.8
Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 10.7 (−5%)
8.0Faster than 35% of oil tanker ships12.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 33.66 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+323%)
4.51Ranks 1,547 of 1,665, lowest first27.66
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports59%
  • From the EU13%
  • Into the EU11%
  • At berth in the EU16%

67% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,094 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
16.3%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
0.1 t
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.015
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • RUBIKON 202
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • RUBIKON 202
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • RUBIKON 202
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2024→2025+1.7 kn+3%+25%−12%−17%1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−2.4 kn+2%−20%−26%+7%2.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023+0.7 kn−10%−4%+24%−10%0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022+0.7 kn−14%−7%+7%−11%0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021+0.0 kn−10%−10%+11%−18%Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020+4.8 kn−15%+74%+33%+9%4.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019−0.2 kn+11%+5%−8%−1%Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2025part-year75. PHOENIX PCT UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “VENUS“6091,9516,80766910.289.443.83–
2025Rubikon Shipping Company doo Beograd2,3867,64927,1192,65110.288.033.66–
202475. PHOENIX PCT UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “VENUS“2,6418,46630,9723,6628.585.340.44–
2023not published3,50111,22642,0553,87410.983.337.77–
2022not published3,13610,01934,0453,34410.292.142.17–
2021not published3,38310,80831,7433,3379.5106.647.39–
2020not published3,38810,81728,5603,0059.5118.657.97–
2019not published3,0009,50821,4214,6044.7140.152.97–
2018not published2,9349,29523,3464,7464.9125.753.28–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2025part-year75. PHOENIX PCT UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “VENUS“––––EnvServiceA
2025Rubikon Shipping Company doo Beograd33.667.95+323%1,547 of 1,665EnvServiceB+C
202475. PHOENIX PCT UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co. KG MS “VENUS“40.448.06+402%1,710 of 1,787EnvServiceA
2023not published37.778.44+348%1,704 of 1,797Swiss ClimateA
2022not published42.1716.06+163%1,285 of 1,409Swiss ClimateA
2021not published47.3916.69+184%1,257 of 1,343Swiss ClimateA
2020not published57.9716.16+259%1,273 of 1,312Swiss ClimateA
2019not published52.9717.32+206%1,248 of 1,321Swiss ClimateA
2018not published53.2817.14+211%1,214 of 1,294Swiss ClimateA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

RUBIKON 202 (IMO 9344423): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2018–2025 | Navalyze