Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

AEGEAN NOBILITY

IMO: 9345441
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 77,055 t
Port of registry: Piraeus
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.29 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ARCADIA SHIPMANAGEMENT CO. LTD.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 77,055 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

154.0 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 128.5 kg/nm (+20%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

6.34

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 7.95 (−20%)

Average speed

8.6 kn

Oil tanker median 10.7 kn (−20%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,681 t

CO₂ emitted

8,504 t

8,635 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

17,407 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,036 h

85 days, 23% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 154.0 kg/nm · median 128.5 (+20%)

76.1Ranks 1,237 of 1,665, lowest first190.8

Average speedThis ship 8.6 kn · median 10.7 (−20%)

8.0Faster than 13% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.34 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−20%)

4.51Ranks 513 of 1,665, lowest first27.66

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU25%
Into the EU64%
At berth in the EU11%

56% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (4,736 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

11.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

AEGEAN NOBILITY
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AEGEAN NOBILITY
Oil tanker median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AEGEAN NOBILITY
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−7%	−6%	−27%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.2 kn	+20%	+5%	−38%	−12%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−28%	−23%	+74%	−29%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+18%	+11%	−12%	+29%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	+6%	−2%	−46%	+5%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.2 kn	+1%	+47%	+4%	−10%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	+12%	−3%	+10%	+19%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	ARCADIA SHIPMANAGEMENT CO. LTD.	2,681	8,504	17,407	2,036	8.6	154.0	6.34	–
2024	ARCADIA SHIPMANAGEMENT CO. LTD.	3,985	12,522	24,007	2,857	8.4	166.0	8.32	–
2023	not published	5,344	16,799	38,587	4,017	9.6	138.5	9.50	–
2022	not published	4,258	13,446	22,143	2,482	8.9	192.3	13.40	–
2021	not published	4,122	13,017	25,198	2,670	9.4	163.6	10.38	–
2020	not published	7,153	22,653	46,345	4,559	10.2	154.3	9.86	–
2019	not published	6,790	21,243	44,373	6,330	7.0	153.0	10.97	–
2018	not published	5,532	17,345	40,408	4,994	8.1	136.9	9.21	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ARCADIA SHIPMANAGEMENT CO. LTD.	6.34	7.95	−20%	513 of 1,665	DNV	A
2024	ARCADIA SHIPMANAGEMENT CO. LTD.	8.32	8.06	+3%	944 of 1,787	DNV	A
2023	not published	9.50	8.44	+13%	1,055 of 1,797	DNV	A
2022	not published	13.40	8.51	+57%	1,471 of 1,961	DNV	A
2021	not published	10.38	8.86	+17%	1,090 of 1,789	DNV	A
2020	not published	9.86	9.03	+9%	1,036 of 1,870	DNV	A
2019	not published	10.97	8.83	+24%	1,261 of 1,919	DNV	A
2018	not published	9.21	8.86	+4%	932 of 1,779	DNV	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.