Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

AEGEAN NOBILITY

IMO: 9345441
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 77,055 t
Flag (estimated): Greece
Port of registry: Piraeus
Technical efficiency: EEXI 3.29 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ARCADIA SHIPMANAGEMENT CO. LTD.

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 49,573 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

154

Oil tanker median 134 kg/nm (+15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

9.86

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 9.03 (+9%)

Average speed

10.2 kn

Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

37.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

7,153 t

CO₂ emitted

22,653 t

Distance sailed

46,345 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,559 h

190 days, 52% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 154 kg/nm · median 129 (+20%)

76.1Ranks 1,237 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 8.6 kn · median 10.7 (−20%)

8.0Faster than 13% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 6.34 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (−20%)

4.51Ranks 513 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports15%
From the EU37%
Into the EU39%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,978 t

8.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

AEGEAN NOBILITY
Oil tanker median

120.0140.0160.0180.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AEGEAN NOBILITY
Oil tanker median

7.08.09.010.011.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AEGEAN NOBILITY
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.2 kn	−7%	−6%	−27%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.2 kn	+20%	+5%	−38%	−12%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.7 kn	−28%	−23%	+74%	−29%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 28%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+18%	+11%	−12%	+29%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 18%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.8 kn	+6%	−2%	−46%	+5%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.2 kn	+1%	+47%	+4%	−10%	3.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	+12%	−3%	+10%	+19%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	ARCADIA SHIPMANAGEMENT CO. LTD.	2,681	8,504	17,407	2,036	8.6	154	6.34	–
2024	ARCADIA SHIPMANAGEMENT CO. LTD.	3,985	12,522	24,007	2,857	8.4	166	8.32	–
2023	not published	5,344	16,799	38,587	4,017	9.6	139	9.50	–
2022	not published	4,258	13,446	22,143	2,482	8.9	192	13.4	–
2021	not published	4,122	13,017	25,198	2,670	9.4	164	10.4	–
2020	not published	7,153	22,653	46,345	4,559	10.2	154	9.86	–
2019	not published	6,790	21,243	44,373	6,330	7.0	153	11.0	–
2018	not published	5,532	17,345	40,408	4,994	8.1	137	9.21	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	ARCADIA SHIPMANAGEMENT CO. LTD.	6.34	7.95	−20%	513 of 1,665	DNV	A
2024	ARCADIA SHIPMANAGEMENT CO. LTD.	8.32	8.06	+3%	944 of 1,787	DNV	A
2023	not published	9.50	8.44	+13%	1,055 of 1,797	DNV	A
2022	not published	13.4	8.51	+57%	1,471 of 1,961	DNV	A
2021	not published	10.4	8.86	+17%	1,090 of 1,789	DNV	A
2020	not published	9.86	9.03	+9%	1,036 of 1,870	DNV	A
2019	not published	11.0	8.83	+24%	1,261 of 1,919	DNV	A
2018	not published	9.21	8.86	+4%	932 of 1,779	DNV	–

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.