Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

JIN SHUN

IMO: 9346160
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 17,753 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EIV 6.08 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: TESORO

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Goldbeam International Ltd.

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,753 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

114.3 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 86.5 kg/nm (+32%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.44

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.24 (+148%)

Average speed

11.4 kn

Bulk carrier median 11.1 kn (+3%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

405 t

CO₂ emitted

1,286 t

Distance sailed

3,545 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

311 h

13 days, 4% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2020

Set against all 3,150 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 114.3 kg/nm · median 86.5 (+32%)

63.9Ranks 2,722 of 3,150, lowest first123.3

Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 11.1 (+3%)

9.3Faster than 63% of bulk carrier ships12.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 20.44 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.24 (+148%)

5.13Ranks 3,027 of 3,150, lowest first14.62

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports66%
From the EU29%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

4.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

JIN SHUN
Bulk carrier median

80.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’192019’202020

Average speed, kn

JIN SHUN
Bulk carrier median

10.010.511.011.5

’192019’202020

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

JIN SHUN
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’192019’202020

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2019→2020	+0.1 kn	+14%	+15%	−80%	+144%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	Goldbeam International Ltd.	0	0	–	0	–	–	–	–
2020	not published	405	1,286	3,545	311	11.4	114.3	20.44	–
2019	not published	1,738	5,431	17,335	1,531	11.3	100.2	8.39	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	Goldbeam International Ltd.	–	–	–	–	Verifavia	C
2020	not published	20.44	8.24	+148%	3,027 of 3,150	ABS	B
2019	not published	8.39	8.38	+0%	1,683 of 3,360	ABS	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.