Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

FSL HONG KONG

IMO: 9346732
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 61,708 t
Port of registry: Singapore
Technical efficiency: EIV 4.19 g CO₂/t·nm

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 61,708 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

166.9 kg/nm

Oil tanker median 133.9 kg/nm (+25%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

8.50

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 9.03 (−6%)

Average speed

10.7 kn

Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (−3%)

Fuel per day at sea

43.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,232 t

CO₂ emitted

16,438 t

Distance sailed

31,340 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,917 h

122 days, 33% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,870 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 166.9 kg/nm · median 133.9 (+25%)

81.5Ranks 1,404 of 1,870, lowest first204.2

Average speedThis ship 10.7 kn · median 11.0 (−3%)

8.1Faster than 43% of oil tanker ships12.5

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 8.50 g CO₂/t·nm · median 9.03 (−6%)

4.81Ranks 853 of 1,870, lowest first26.30

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports7%
From the EU46%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

5.9%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

–

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

FSL HONG KONG
Oil tanker median

100.0200.0300.0400.0500.0

’182018’192019’202020

Average speed, kn

FSL HONG KONG
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

FSL HONG KONG
Oil tanker median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2019→2020	+4.3 kn	−63%	−38%	+32%	−66%	4.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 63%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	+128%	+117%	+350%	+257%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 128%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2020	not published	5,232	16,438	31,340	2,917	10.7	166.9	8.50	–
2019	not published	10,655	33,548	23,765	3,701	6.4	448.4	24.79	–
2018	not published	1,040	3,249	5,282	784	6.7	196.9	6.95	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2020	not published	8.50	9.03	−6%	853 of 1,870	DNV	C
2019	not published	24.79	8.83	+181%	1,723 of 1,919	DNV	C
2018	not published	6.95	8.86	−22%	573 of 1,779	DNV	C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.