Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

BERNHARD

IMO
9347774
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
5,858 t
Flag (estimated)
Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry
St. John'S
Technical efficiency
EEXI 24.60 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names
JSP SLEIPNER, NCL MAKRELL, SYNETOS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS "Ensenada" Schifffahrts UG (haftungsbeschraenkt) & Co. KG

?
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,829 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
106
Container median 172 kg/nm (−38%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
70.4
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+300%)
Average speed
12.8 kn
Container median 14.0 kn (−9%)
Fuel per day at sea
32.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
6,384 t
CO₂ emitted
20,467 t
Distance sailed
60,218 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
4,687 h
195 days, 54% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 86.4 kg/nm · median 177 (−51%)
78.8Ranks 353 of 2,208, lowest first302
Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 13.3 (−19%)
9.1Faster than 20% of container ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 46.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+185%)
7.22Ranks 1,983 of 2,208, lowest first46.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports93%
  • From the EU0%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU7%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1,357 t
6.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • BERNHARD
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • BERNHARD
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • BERNHARD
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−1.9 kn+0%−15%−30%−23%1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024+0.1 kn+1%+2%+7%−15%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023−1.1 kn−7%−14%−5%+16%1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022+0.5 kn−15%−12%−0%−10%0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021+0.4 kn+2%+5%−5%−3%0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020+0.9 kn+1%+8%+23%+3%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019+5.1 kn+7%+88%+70%+28%5.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025part-yearMS "Ensenada" Schifffahrts UG (haftungsbeschraenkt) & Co. KG2,4157,58728,5032,62710.984.742.699%
2025part-yearMS "Ensenada" Schifffahrts UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co.KG7822,4698,84176111.688.454.2–
2025Ruby Shiptrade SA3,54011,13540,9563,79410.886.446.468%
2024MS "Ensenada" Schiffahrts UG & Co5,03515,96458,5494,59712.786.060.5–
2023not published4,65814,93354,5084,32912.685.571.1–
2022not published5,24616,81957,2984,19813.791.661.2–
2021not published6,20819,90257,4114,35713.210868.1–
2020not published6,38420,46760,2184,68712.810670.4–
2019not published5,14916,31148,8574,09811.910568.5100%
2018not published2,8288,81628,7574,2056.898.353.5100%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2025part-yearMS "Ensenada" Schifffahrts UG (haftungsbeschraenkt) & Co. KG––––RINAA
2025part-yearMS "Ensenada" Schifffahrts UG (haftungsbeschrankt) & Co.KG––––Swiss ClimateA
2025Ruby Shiptrade SA46.416.3+185%1,983 of 2,208VerifaviaA
2024MS "Ensenada" Schiffahrts UG & Co60.517.5+245%1,860 of 1,974Swiss ClimateA
2023not published71.119.4+266%1,852 of 1,899Swiss ClimateA
2022not published61.219.1+220%1,723 of 1,825Swiss ClimateA
2021not published68.117.9+280%1,729 of 1,781Swiss ClimateA
2020not published70.417.6+300%1,748 of 1,797Bureau VeritasA
2019not published68.518.9+263%1,709 of 1,788Bureau VeritasA
2018not published53.520.2+165%1,528 of 1,705Bureau VeritasA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.