Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

MAERSK INNOSHIMA

IMO
9348170
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
13,088 t
Port of registry
Singapore
Technical efficiency
EEDI 19.56 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 13,088 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
123.5 kg/nm
Container median 177.5 kg/nm (−30%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
29.40
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.13 (+54%)
Average speed
13.0 kn
Container median 13.6 kn (−4%)
Fuel per day at sea
38.7 t/day
Fuel consumed
241 t
CO₂ emitted
751 t
Distance sailed
1,951 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
150 h
6 days, 2% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,825 container ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 123.5 kg/nm · median 177.5 (−30%)
77.9Ranks 608 of 1,825, lowest first313.7
Average speedThis ship 13.0 kn · median 13.6 (−4%)
10.1Faster than 41% of container ships16.1
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 29.40 g CO₂/t·nm · median 19.13 (+54%)
7.44Ranks 1,285 of 1,825, lowest first52.60
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU91%
  • Into the EU8%
  • At berth in the EU1%
Fuel burned laden
99%
1% in ballast or unladen
CO₂ at berth
1.3%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • MAERSK INNOSHIMA
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • MAERSK INNOSHIMA
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • MAERSK INNOSHIMA
  • Container median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2021→2022+2.2 kn−18%−1%+0%+58%2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2022not published2417511,95115013.0123.529.4099%
2021not published2939121,94618010.8150.418.63–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2022not published29.4019.13+54%1,285 of 1,825ABSC
2021not published18.6317.90+4%921 of 1,781ABSC

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

MAERSK INNOSHIMA (IMO 9348170): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2021–2022 | Navalyze