Navalyze

Navalyze · Other · Ship

ASTERIX

IMO
9348182
Type
Other ship types
Port of registry
Quebec City
Technical efficiency
EIV 21.54 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
89.6 kg/nm
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
–
g CO₂/t·nm
Average speed
12.8 kn
Fuel per day at sea
27.6 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,567 t
CO₂ emitted
5,023 t
Distance sailed
17,483 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,363 h
57 days, 16% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2022

Set against all 1,034 general cargo ships with a full-year 2022 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 106.2 kg/nm · median 57.3 (+85%)
36.2Ranks 996 of 1,034, lowest first96.6
Average speedThis ship 14.2 kn · median 10.8 (+31%)
8.0Faster than 97% of general cargo ships12.9
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 41.48 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 21.57 (+92%)
9.00Ranks 909 of 1,034, lowest first43.69
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU48%
  • Into the EU50%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
1.8%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • ASTERIX
  • Other median

Average speed, kn

  • ASTERIX
  • Other median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • ASTERIX
  • Other median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2022→2023−1.4 kn−16%−24%+152%–1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 16%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2022−0.1 kn−10%−10%−35%+17%Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2023not published1,5675,02317,4831,36312.889.6––
2022not published7362,3606,93449014.2106.259.16–
2020not published1,2564,08210,68874914.3117.5––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOther medianvs OtherRankVerifierMethods
2023not published––––Dromon Bureau of ShippingB
2022not published41.4821.57+92%909 of 1,034Lloyd's RegisterB
2020not published35.4824.50+45%922 of 1,167Lloyd's RegisterB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

ASTERIX (IMO 9348182): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2020–2023 | Navalyze