Navalyze · Container · Ship

ELBSPRINTER

IMO: 9349215
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,741 t
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 28.25 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: ASTROSPRINTER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS Elblaeufer GmbH

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 4,741 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

77.5 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−56%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

50.81

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+212%)

Average speed

12.2 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

22.7 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,775 t

CO₂ emitted

11,732 t

11,918 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

48,704 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,986 h

166 days, 46% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 77.5 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−56%)

78.8Ranks 201 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 12.2 kn · median 13.3 (−8%)

9.1Faster than 33% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 50.81 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+212%)

7.22Ranks 2,034 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports87%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU13%

93% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (10,950 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

12.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.2 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ELBSPRINTER
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ELBSPRINTER
Container median

11.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ELBSPRINTER
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+6%	+7%	−8%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	+12%	+14%	−22%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 12%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.0 kn	+2%	+2%	+9%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	−12%	−14%	+0%	+19%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.0 kn	+3%	+3%	−15%	−17%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 3%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.7 kn	+0%	−5%	−2%	+3%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	−0%	+5%	+13%	+20%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	MS Elblaeufer GmbH	3,775	11,732	48,704	3,986	12.2	77.5	50.81	–
2024	MS Elblaeufer GmbH	3,850	12,021	52,929	4,346	12.2	72.8	50.95	–
2023	not published	4,413	13,887	67,712	5,668	11.9	65.2	61.14	–
2022	not published	4,004	12,677	62,337	5,236	11.9	64.2	60.06	–
2021	not published	4,514	14,255	62,177	5,041	12.3	72.6	50.67	–
2020	not published	5,166	16,311	73,187	5,930	12.3	70.6	61.24	–
2019	not published	5,263	16,565	74,896	5,748	13.0	70.3	59.33	–
2018	not published	4,663	14,699	66,052	5,364	12.3	70.6	49.41	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS Elblaeufer GmbH	50.81	16.30	+212%	2,034 of 2,208	EnvService	B
2024	MS Elblaeufer GmbH	50.95	17.52	+191%	1,769 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	61.14	19.40	+215%	1,795 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	60.06	19.13	+214%	1,712 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	50.67	17.90	+183%	1,612 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	61.24	17.58	+248%	1,700 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	59.33	18.88	+214%	1,647 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	49.41	20.22	+144%	1,477 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.