Navalyze

Navalyze · General cargo · Ship

VICTORY SHINE

IMO
9349291
Type
General cargo ship
Port of registry
Monrovia
Technical efficiency
EIV 13.49 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA
Former names
BBC KANSAS
?

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
61.3 kg/nm
General cargo median 55.1 kg/nm (+11%)
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)
76.27
g CO₂/dwt·nm · General cargo median 24.50 (+211%)
Average speed
11.1 kn
General cargo median 10.7 kn (+4%)
Fuel per day at sea
16.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
1,510 t
CO₂ emitted
4,747 t
Distance sailed
24,629 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
2,218 h
92 days, 25% of the year

Within the general cargo fleet, 2020

Set against all 1,167 general cargo ships with a full-year 2020 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 61.3 kg/nm · median 55.1 (+11%)
36.0Ranks 696 of 1,167, lowest first90.9
Average speedThis ship 11.1 kn · median 10.7 (+4%)
8.2Faster than 58% of general cargo ships12.9
CO₂ per transport work (dwt)This ship 76.27 g CO₂/dwt·nm · median 24.50 (+211%)
11.30Ranks 1,123 of 1,167, lowest first48.87
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%General cargo medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports11%
  • From the EU12%
  • Into the EU74%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
2.3%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The General cargo median is the middle ship of all general cargo ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • VICTORY SHINE
  • General cargo median

Average speed, kn

  • VICTORY SHINE
  • General cargo median

CO₂ per transport work (dwt), g CO₂/dwt·nm

  • VICTORY SHINE
  • General cargo median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2019→2020+0.9 kn−12%−5%+7%+328%0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2020not published1,5104,74724,6292,21811.161.3––
2019not published1,6025,00022,9992,25110.269.6––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/dwt·nmGeneral cargo medianvs General cargoRankVerifierMethods
2020not published76.2724.50+211%1,123 of 1,167DNVC
2019not published17.8024.96−29%258 of 1,154Bureau VeritasB

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. General cargo ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (dwt) (TW), in g CO₂/dwt·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's general cargo ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

VICTORY SHINE (IMO 9349291): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2019–2020 | Navalyze