Navalyze · Container · Ship

MISSOURI EXPRESS

IMO: 9349552
Type: Container ship
Flag (estimated): United States
Port of registry: Savannah, Ga
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.47 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: AL HILAL

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Marine Transport Management

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 46,939 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

241

Container median 178 kg/nm (+36%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

16.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (−15%)

Average speed

16.0 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+18%)

Fuel per day at sea

92.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,105 t

CO₂ emitted

38,054 t

Distance sailed

50,137 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,141 h

131 days, 36% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 188 kg/nm · median 167 (+13%)

78.9Ranks 1,133 of 1,974, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 15.5 kn · median 13.5 (+15%)

9.6Faster than 83% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 13.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.5 (−23%)

7.33Ranks 713 of 1,974, lowest first51.6

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports9%
From the EU15%
Into the EU72%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

11,572 t

96% of all fuel; 4% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

1,686 t

4.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MISSOURI EXPRESS
Container median

160.0180.0200.0220.0240.0260.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MISSOURI EXPRESS
Container median

13.014.015.016.017.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MISSOURI EXPRESS
Container median

12.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.4 kn	−10%	−2%	−50%	–	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−7%	−4%	+20%	−30%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.9 kn	−17%	−21%	−16%	+19%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+1.6 kn	+18%	+30%	−18%	+25%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2021	−0.7 kn	−15%	−19%	+31%	−40%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.3 kn	+7%	+9%	−25%	+25%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Marine Transport Management	4,254	13,308	25,057	1,484	16.9	170	–	39%
2024	Marine Transport Management	9,471	29,658	50,323	3,248	15.5	188	13.5	97%
2023	not published	8,476	26,573	42,099	2,794	15.1	201	19.2	90%
2022	not published	12,105	38,054	50,137	3,141	16.0	241	16.2	96%
2021	not published	12,546	39,396	61,106	4,245	14.4	205	12.9	97%
2019	not published	11,299	35,323	46,757	3,093	15.1	242	21.4	–
2018	not published	14,015	43,804	62,019	4,186	14.8	226	17.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Marine Transport Management	–	–	–	–	ABS	A
2024	Marine Transport Management	13.5	17.5	−23%	713 of 1,974	ABS	–
2023	not published	19.2	19.4	−1%	934 of 1,899	ABS	–
2022	not published	16.2	19.1	−15%	776 of 1,825	ABS	–
2021	not published	12.9	17.9	−28%	540 of 1,781	ABS	–
2019	not published	21.4	18.9	+13%	1,021 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	17.2	20.2	−15%	680 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.