Navalyze · Container · Ship

HUDSON EXPRESS

IMO: 9349564
Type: Container ship
Flag (estimated): United States
Port of registry: Charleston, Sc
Technical efficiency: EEXI 10.48 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: AL RAWDAH

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Marine Transport Management

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 42,070 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

256

Container median 182 kg/nm (+41%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 20.2 (−6%)

Average speed

14.0 kn

Container median 13.8 kn (+1%)

Fuel per day at sea

85.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

10,804 t

CO₂ emitted

33,825 t

Distance sailed

42,139 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,017 h

126 days, 34% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,974 container ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 195 kg/nm · median 167 (+17%)

78.9Ranks 1,157 of 1,974, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 16.0 kn · median 13.5 (+19%)

9.6Faster than 89% of container ships16.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 17.5 (−20%)

7.33Ranks 764 of 1,974, lowest first51.6

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports49%
From the EU24%
Into the EU23%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,235 t

3.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HUDSON EXPRESS
Container median

150.0175.0200.0225.0250.0275.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HUDSON EXPRESS
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HUDSON EXPRESS
Container median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.8 kn	+6%	+18%	−59%	–	1.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.7 kn	−13%	−16%	+23%	−29%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	−1.1 kn	−11%	−17%	−30%	+25%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 11%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+2.0 kn	+16%	+31%	+49%	−3%	2.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−4%	−0%	+160%	+25%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	−10%	−4%	−62%	−31%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.2 kn	−2%	−0%	−1%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Marine Transport Management	4,495	14,028	21,680	1,217	17.8	207	–	99%
2024	Marine Transport Management	10,271	32,148	52,616	3,279	16.0	195	14.1	97%
2023	not published	9,618	30,174	42,918	2,570	16.7	224	19.8	93%
2022	not published	15,515	48,676	61,569	3,449	17.8	252	15.8	97%
2021	not published	8,949	28,201	41,266	2,614	15.8	217	16.3	97%
2020	not published	3,601	11,401	15,877	1,049	15.1	227	13.0	–
2019	not published	10,450	32,699	41,610	2,928	14.2	251	19.0	–
2018	not published	10,804	33,825	42,139	3,017	14.0	256	19.1	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Marine Transport Management	–	–	–	–	ABS	A
2024	Marine Transport Management	14.1	17.5	−20%	764 of 1,974	ABS	–
2023	not published	19.8	19.4	+2%	974 of 1,899	ABS	–
2022	not published	15.8	19.1	−17%	756 of 1,825	ABS	–
2021	not published	16.3	17.9	−9%	807 of 1,781	ABS	–
2020	not published	13.0	17.6	−26%	577 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	19.0	18.9	+0%	899 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	19.1	20.2	−6%	788 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.