Navalyze · Container · Ship

APL MINNESOTA

IMO: 9350018
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 49,538 t
Flag (estimated): Liberia
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EIV 35.69 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Shoei Ship Management Pte Ltd · part of Shoei

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 53,924 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

219

Container median 172 kg/nm (+27%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

12.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (−27%)

Average speed

14.8 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (+6%)

Fuel per day at sea

77.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

15,599 t

CO₂ emitted

49,386 t

Distance sailed

71,383 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,828 h

201 days, 55% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 183 kg/nm · median 177 (+4%)

78.8Ranks 1,157 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 12.7 kn · median 13.3 (−5%)

9.1Faster than 40% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 11.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (−29%)

7.22Ranks 757 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports61%
From the EU11%
Into the EU21%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

3,615 t

7.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

APL MINNESOTA
Container median

150.0200.0250.0300.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

APL MINNESOTA
Container median

12.014.016.018.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

APL MINNESOTA
Container median

10.012.515.017.520.022.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.7 kn	−13%	−23%	+145%	–	1.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−2%	+1%	−43%	–	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.9 kn	−1%	−23%	−26%	+1%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.2 kn	−14%	−8%	−12%	−17%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.9 kn	+15%	+30%	+3%	+33%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+1.2 kn	−4%	+4%	+69%	−15%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.9 kn	−15%	−34%	+180%	−6%	3.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Shoei Ship Management Pte Ltd	12,163	38,174	66,317	5,241	12.7	183	11.6	–
2024	Shoei Ship Management Pte Ltd	5,669	17,796	27,045	1,884	14.4	210	–	–
2023	not published	10,240	32,167	47,824	3,427	14.0	214	14.2	–
2022	not published	13,969	44,245	64,648	3,602	17.9	216	14.1	–
2021	not published	18,583	58,822	73,803	4,429	16.7	252	17.0	–
2020	not published	15,599	49,386	71,383	4,828	14.8	219	12.8	–
2019	not published	9,619	30,122	42,264	3,098	13.6	228	15.2	–
2018	not published	4,038	12,606	15,076	861	17.5	268	16.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Shoei Ship Management Pte Ltd	11.6	16.3	−29%	757 of 2,208	ClassNK	C
2024	Shoei Ship Management Pte Ltd	–	–	–	–	ClassNK	C
2023	not published	14.2	19.4	−27%	689 of 1,899	ClassNK	C
2022	not published	14.1	19.1	−26%	635 of 1,825	ClassNK	B+C
2021	not published	17.0	17.9	−5%	842 of 1,781	ClassNK	B+C
2020	not published	12.8	17.6	−27%	561 of 1,797	ClassNK	C
2019	not published	15.2	18.9	−20%	665 of 1,788	ClassNK	C
2018	not published	16.2	20.2	−20%	626 of 1,705	ClassNK	A+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.