Navalyze · Ro-ro · Ship

SEATRUCK POINT

IMO: 9350666
Type: Ro-ro ship
Average cargo carried: 1,368 t
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 21.44 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: CLIPPER POINT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: CLdN RoRo Ltd · part of CLdN

Report year

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,368 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

92.2 kg/nm

Ro-ro median 105.9 kg/nm (−13%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

210

g CO₂/t·nm · Ro-ro median 97.53 (+115%)

Average speed

12.6 kn

Ro-ro median 14.5 kn (−13%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

40 t

CO₂ emitted

126 t

128 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

437 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

35 h

1 days, 0% of the year

Within the ro-ro fleet, 2024

Set against all 220 ro-ro ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 92.2 kg/nm · median 105.9 (−13%)

59.5Ranks 68 of 220, lowest first146.1

Average speedThis ship 12.6 kn · median 14.5 (−13%)

10.4Faster than 26% of ro-ro ships17.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 209.90 g CO₂/t·nm · median 97.53 (+115%)

50.69Ranks 176 of 220, lowest first309.34

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Ro-ro medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU50%
Into the EU48%
At berth in the EU2%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (64 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1.2%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Ro-ro median is the middle ship of all ro-ro ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SEATRUCK POINT
Ro-ro median

90.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Average speed, kn

SEATRUCK POINT
Ro-ro median

12.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SEATRUCK POINT
Ro-ro median

50.0100150200250

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−18%	−21%	−97%	+10%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	+4%	−1%	−75%	−2%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.4 kn	+8%	+11%	−24%	−3%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.5 kn	−6%	−10%	+10%	−11%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	−8%	−2%	−0%	+7%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	+7%	−2%	−9%	+11%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2024	CLdN RoRo Ltd	40	126	437	35	12.6	92.2	209.90	–
2023	not published	1,431	4,464	12,719	979	13.0	112.5	190.65	–
2022	not published	5,618	17,532	51,829	3,812	13.6	108.4	195.13	–
2021	not published	6,856	21,381	68,094	5,173	13.2	100.7	200.20	–
2020	not published	6,634	20,710	61,833	4,524	13.7	107.3	225.00	–
2019	not published	7,252	22,636	62,000	4,844	12.8	117.0	210.80	–
2018	not published	7,451	23,249	67,960	4,858	14.0	109.6	190.55	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Ro-ro median	vs Ro-ro	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2024	CLdN RoRo Ltd	209.90	97.53	+115%	176 of 220	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	190.65	108.62	+76%	167 of 221	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	195.13	90.62	+115%	184 of 223	DNV	A+C
2021	not published	200.20	103.64	+93%	174 of 219	DNV	A+C
2020	not published	225.00	102.77	+119%	189 of 238	DNV	A+C
2019	not published	210.80	90.89	+132%	221 of 271	DNV	A+C
2018	not published	190.55	91.03	+109%	213 of 260	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Ro-ro ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's ro-ro ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.