Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ATLANTIC MATE

IMO: 9350745
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 7,767 t
Port of registry: Gibraltar
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.62 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,767 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

69.7 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−13%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

28.55

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+90%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,283 t

CO₂ emitted

7,263 t

7,375 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

32,756 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,081 h

128 days, 35% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 69.7 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−13%)

52.8Ranks 488 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 11.1 (−5%)

8.8Faster than 37% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 28.55 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+90%)

7.93Ranks 1,153 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports52%
From the EU17%
Into the EU17%
At berth in the EU14%

77% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,605 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

14.4%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

ATLANTIC MATE
Chemical tanker median

60.070.080.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ATLANTIC MATE
Chemical tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ATLANTIC MATE
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−8%	−11%	−1%	−14%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	+5%	+7%	−5%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−4%	−3%	+24%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	−5%	+2%	+2%	−14%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	+4%	−3%	−5%	−1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+5.9 kn	−25%	+69%	+18%	−10%	5.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	+2%	−2%	−1%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG	2,283	7,263	32,756	3,081	10.6	69.7	28.55	–
2024	Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG	2,507	7,936	33,186	3,026	11.0	75.5	33.35	1%
2023	not published	2,509	7,988	34,942	3,244	10.8	71.8	37.90	–
2022	not published	2,098	6,726	28,148	2,623	10.7	74.5	34.54	–
2021	not published	2,169	6,953	27,668	2,766	10.0	78.4	40.24	–
2020	not published	2,204	7,067	29,236	2,743	10.7	75.4	40.46	–
2019	not published	2,478	7,905	24,709	5,196	4.8	100.3	44.89	–
2018	not published	2,445	7,833	24,934	5,041	4.9	98.1	42.64	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG	28.55	15.04	+90%	1,153 of 1,460	Swiss Climate	A
2024	Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG	33.35	16.73	+99%	1,036 of 1,274	Swiss Climate	A
2023	not published	37.90	16.23	+134%	1,127 of 1,314	Swiss Climate	A
2022	not published	34.54	16.06	+115%	1,199 of 1,409	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	40.24	16.69	+141%	1,198 of 1,343	Swiss Climate	A
2020	not published	40.46	16.16	+150%	1,174 of 1,312	Swiss Climate	A
2019	not published	44.89	17.32	+159%	1,205 of 1,321	Swiss Climate	A
2018	not published	42.64	17.14	+149%	1,153 of 1,294	Swiss Climate	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.