Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

ATLANTIC MATE

IMO: 9350745
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 7,767 t
Flag (estimated): Gibraltar
Port of registry: Gibraltar
Technical efficiency: EEDI 7.62 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,367 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

98.1

Chemical tanker median 90.2 kg/nm (+9%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

42.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.1 (+149%)

Average speed

4.9 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (−51%)

Fuel per day at sea

11.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,445 t

CO₂ emitted

7,833 t

Distance sailed

24,934 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,041 h

210 days, 58% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 69.7 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−13%)

52.8Ranks 488 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.6 kn · median 11.1 (−5%)

8.8Faster than 37% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 28.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+90%)

7.93Ranks 1,153 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports72%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU28%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2,192 t

28.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

ATLANTIC MATE
Chemical tanker median

60.070.080.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

ATLANTIC MATE
Chemical tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

ATLANTIC MATE
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−8%	−11%	−1%	−14%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	+5%	+7%	−5%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.1 kn	−4%	−3%	+24%	+10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	−5%	+2%	+2%	−14%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−0.7 kn	+4%	−3%	−5%	−1%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+5.9 kn	−25%	+69%	+18%	−10%	5.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 25%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.1 kn	+2%	−2%	−1%	+5%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG	2,283	7,263	32,756	3,081	10.6	69.7	28.6	–
2024	Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG	2,507	7,936	33,186	3,026	11.0	75.5	33.4	1%
2023	not published	2,509	7,988	34,942	3,244	10.8	71.8	37.9	–
2022	not published	2,098	6,726	28,148	2,623	10.7	74.5	34.5	–
2021	not published	2,169	6,953	27,668	2,766	10.0	78.4	40.2	–
2020	not published	2,204	7,067	29,236	2,743	10.7	75.4	40.5	–
2019	not published	2,478	7,905	24,709	5,196	4.8	100	44.9	–
2018	not published	2,445	7,833	24,934	5,041	4.9	98.1	42.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG	28.6	15.0	+90%	1,153 of 1,460	Swiss Climate	A
2024	Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG	33.4	16.7	+99%	1,036 of 1,274	Swiss Climate	A
2023	not published	37.9	16.2	+134%	1,127 of 1,314	Swiss Climate	A
2022	not published	34.5	16.1	+115%	1,199 of 1,409	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	40.2	16.7	+141%	1,198 of 1,343	Swiss Climate	A
2020	not published	40.5	16.2	+150%	1,174 of 1,312	Swiss Climate	A
2019	not published	44.9	17.3	+159%	1,205 of 1,321	Swiss Climate	A
2018	not published	42.6	17.1	+149%	1,153 of 1,294	Swiss Climate	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.