Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

HEINRICH

IMO: 9350757
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 8,521 t
Flag (estimated): Gibraltar
Port of registry: Gibraltar
Technical efficiency: EIV 13.92 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: JUTLANDIA SWAN

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 8,008 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

86.4

Chemical tanker median 81.9 kg/nm (+5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

34.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (+113%)

Average speed

10.1 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (−10%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,958 t

CO₂ emitted

6,277 t

Distance sailed

22,656 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,241 h

93 days, 26% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 78.4 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−2%)

52.8Ranks 688 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 11.1 (−8%)

8.8Faster than 27% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 29.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+94%)

7.93Ranks 1,164 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports54%
From the EU14%
Into the EU15%
At berth in the EU17%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,051 t

16.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HEINRICH
Chemical tanker median

75.080.085.090.095.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HEINRICH
Chemical tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HEINRICH
Chemical tanker median

10.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	−0%	−4%	−2%	−6%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.5 kn	−9%	−4%	+50%	−10%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.6 kn	−5%	−10%	−12%	−11%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+2.3 kn	+8%	+38%	−14%	+10%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.2 kn	−1%	−14%	−10%	+15%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+4.1 kn	−14%	+53%	+9%	−6%	4.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.5 kn	+6%	+15%	−9%	+1%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG	2,598	8,247	33,134	3,254	10.2	78.4	29.2	–
2024	Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG	2,672	8,444	33,974	3,191	10.6	78.7	31.1	–
2023	not published	1,958	6,277	22,656	2,241	10.1	86.4	34.6	–
2022	not published	2,348	7,526	25,794	2,413	10.7	91.0	38.8	–
2021	not published	2,514	8,054	29,856	3,542	8.4	84.2	35.4	–
2020	not published	2,834	9,018	33,349	3,457	9.6	85.0	30.9	–
2019	not published	3,011	9,503	30,587	5,584	5.5	98.4	32.7	–
2018	not published	3,143	9,928	33,740	6,726	5.0	93.2	32.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG	29.2	15.0	+94%	1,164 of 1,460	Swiss Climate	A
2024	Carl F. Peters GmbH & Co. KG	31.1	16.7	+86%	1,008 of 1,274	Swiss Climate	A
2023	not published	34.6	16.2	+113%	1,092 of 1,314	Swiss Climate	A
2022	not published	38.8	16.1	+142%	1,246 of 1,409	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	35.4	16.7	+112%	1,136 of 1,343	Bureau Veritas	B
2020	not published	30.9	16.2	+91%	1,064 of 1,312	Bureau Veritas	B
2019	not published	32.7	17.3	+89%	1,079 of 1,321	Bureau Veritas	B
2018	not published	32.3	17.1	+88%	1,049 of 1,294	Bureau Veritas	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.