Navalyze

Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

ELIF TUBA

IMO
9351165
Type
Oil tanker
Average cargo carried
10,998 t
Port of registry
Istanbul
Technical efficiency
EEXI 10.62 g CO₂/t·nm
?

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,998 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile
64.3 kg/nm
Oil tanker median 129.1 kg/nm (−50%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
18.75
g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.44 (+122%)
Average speed
6.7 kn
Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (−39%)
Fuel per day at sea
10.3 t/day
Fuel consumed
51 t
CO₂ emitted
164 t
Distance sailed
796 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
119 h
5 days, 1% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2023

Set against all 1,797 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 64.3 kg/nm · median 129.1 (−50%)
80.4Ranks 66 of 1,797, lowest first192.7
Average speedThis ship 6.7 kn · median 11.0 (−39%)
8.1Faster than 4% of oil tanker ships12.4
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.75 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.44 (+122%)
4.78Ranks 1,509 of 1,797, lowest first25.50
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU98%
  • Into the EU0%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
2.2%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
–
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • ELIF TUBA
  • Oil tanker median

Average speed, kn

  • ELIF TUBA
  • Oil tanker median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • ELIF TUBA
  • Oil tanker median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2022→2023−3.8 kn+20%−24%−26%−64%3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022−0.3 kn−1%−3%−35%+53%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2023not published511647961196.764.318.75–
2022not published581851,07610210.553.651.86–
2021not published892861,65715310.853.933.96–

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmOil tanker medianvs Oil tankerRankVerifierMethods
2023not published18.758.44+122%1,509 of 1,797DNVA+B+C
2022not published51.868.51+509%1,908 of 1,961DNVA+B+C
2021not published33.968.86+283%1,678 of 1,789DNVA+B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

ELIF TUBA (IMO 9351165): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2021–2023 | Navalyze