Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

VS PROGRESS

IMO: 9351426
Type: Oil tanker
Flag (estimated): Isle of Man
Port of registry: Douglas
Technical efficiency: EEXI 4.11 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: HELLESPONT PROGRESS

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Valloeby Progress Limited · part of Valloeby

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 55,801 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

134

Oil tanker median 131 kg/nm (+2%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

7.54

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.51 (−11%)

Average speed

11.1 kn

Oil tanker median 10.9 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

35.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,325 t

CO₂ emitted

7,281 t

Distance sailed

17,304 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,560 h

65 days, 18% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,787 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 167 kg/nm · median 129 (+29%)

79.5Ranks 1,431 of 1,787, lowest first194

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 10.9 (+1%)

8.1Faster than 52% of oil tanker ships12.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.06 (+131%)

4.44Ranks 1,506 of 1,787, lowest first25.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU21%
Into the EU71%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

2,155 t

93% of all fuel; 7% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

544 t

7.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

VS PROGRESS
Oil tanker median

100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0225.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

VS PROGRESS
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.014.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

VS PROGRESS
Oil tanker median

5.010.015.020.0

’182018’192019’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−5.0 kn	−27%	−61%	−70%	–	5.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 27%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−19%	−17%	+157%	+64%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	+53%	+48%	−73%	+51%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 53%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.4 kn	−10%	−20%	+134%	−26%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 10%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2021	+0.2 kn	+21%	+23%	−27%	+20%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−0.3 kn	−11%	−13%	+41%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Valloeby Progress Limited	430	1,339	3,549	596	6.0	121	–	–
2024	Valloeby Progress Limited	1,976	6,185	11,846	1,076	11.0	167	18.6	–
2023	not published	947	2,999	4,611	429	10.8	205	11.4	67%
2022	not published	2,325	7,281	17,304	1,560	11.1	134	7.54	93%
2021	not published	1,104	3,494	7,402	594	12.5	149	10.2	87%
2019	not published	1,255	3,923	10,155	828	12.3	124	8.51	–
2018	not published	993	3,113	7,181	570	12.6	138	10.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Valloeby Progress Limited	–	–	–	–	DNV	A
2024	Valloeby Progress Limited	18.6	8.06	+131%	1,506 of 1,787	DNV	A
2023	not published	11.4	8.44	+35%	1,251 of 1,797	ABS	–
2022	not published	7.54	8.51	−11%	794 of 1,961	ABS	A
2021	not published	10.2	8.86	+15%	1,063 of 1,789	ABS	A
2019	not published	8.51	8.83	−4%	910 of 1,919	ABS	A
2018	not published	10.4	8.86	+17%	1,076 of 1,779	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.