Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

STOLT SAGALAND

IMO: 9352200
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 23,165 t
Flag (estimated): Cayman Islands
Port of registry: George Town
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.28 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stolt Tankers BV

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 19,876 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

133

Chemical tanker median 85.7 kg/nm (+55%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.2 (+30%)

Average speed

12.9 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.4 kn (+13%)

Fuel per day at sea

41.2 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,437 t

CO₂ emitted

10,763 t

Distance sailed

25,861 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,003 h

83 days, 23% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 110 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+39%)

52.8Ranks 1,307 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.4 kn · median 11.1 (+3%)

8.8Faster than 58% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−1%)

7.93Ranks 718 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports10%
From the EU54%
Into the EU30%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

647 t

6.0% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

STOLT SAGALAND
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STOLT SAGALAND
Chemical tanker median

10.011.012.013.014.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

STOLT SAGALAND
Chemical tanker median

10.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.4 kn	+4%	−7%	+185%	−19%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−14%	−13%	−40%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.7 kn	−11%	+2%	+8%	+31%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 11%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.2 kn	+1%	+3%	+24%	−39%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2020→2021	−2.2 kn	+3%	−15%	−27%	+19%	2.2 kn slower, fuel per mile up 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.2 kn	+11%	+12%	−25%	+42%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	−1.1 kn	−12%	−19%	−14%	+8%	1.1 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Stolt Tankers BV	4,749	14,835	43,009	3,782	11.4	110	14.9	–
2024	Stolt Tankers BV	1,596	4,976	15,077	1,182	12.8	106	18.4	–
2023	not published	3,088	9,649	25,099	1,996	12.6	123	19.8	–
2022	not published	3,222	10,089	23,254	2,133	10.9	139	15.2	–
2021	not published	2,569	8,043	18,785	1,757	10.7	137	24.9	–
2020	not published	3,437	10,763	25,861	2,003	12.9	133	20.9	–
2019	not published	4,129	12,924	34,367	2,698	12.7	120	14.7	–
2018	not published	5,497	17,218	40,049	2,903	13.8	137	13.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Stolt Tankers BV	14.9	15.0	−1%	718 of 1,460	DNV	B
2024	Stolt Tankers BV	18.4	16.7	+10%	711 of 1,274	DNV	B
2023	not published	19.8	16.2	+22%	787 of 1,314	DNV	B
2022	not published	15.2	16.1	−6%	638 of 1,409	DNV	B
2021	not published	24.9	16.7	+49%	970 of 1,343	DNV	B
2020	not published	20.9	16.2	+30%	875 of 1,312	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	14.7	17.3	−15%	495 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	13.6	17.1	−21%	422 of 1,294	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.