Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

STOLT SNELAND

IMO: 9352212
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 21,359 t
Flag (estimated): Cayman Islands
Port of registry: George Town
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.28 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Stolt Tankers BV

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 18,562 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

119

Chemical tanker median 83.0 kg/nm (+44%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

20.1

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 16.7 (+20%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.2 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,550 t

CO₂ emitted

11,103 t

Distance sailed

29,790 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,750 h

115 days, 31% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 102 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+27%)

52.8Ranks 1,206 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 11.0 kn · median 11.1 (−1%)

8.8Faster than 47% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 14.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (−1%)

7.93Ranks 715 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports20%
From the EU42%
Into the EU29%
At berth in the EU10%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,077 t

9.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

STOLT SNELAND
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0160.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

STOLT SNELAND
Chemical tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.013.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

STOLT SNELAND
Chemical tanker median

12.014.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.4 kn	−14%	−24%	+35%	+6%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.1 kn	−12%	−12%	−10%	−10%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+1.0 kn	+6%	+16%	−30%	−4%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile up 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+0.7 kn	+5%	+12%	+29%	−19%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.3 kn	+1%	−10%	+81%	+57%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	−3%	−5%	−41%	−24%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 3%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+3.4 kn	−18%	+14%	+63%	−10%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Stolt Tankers BV	3,308	10,315	32,563	2,959	11.0	102	14.8	–
2024Bio blend	Stolt Tankers BV	2,827	8,689	24,042	1,933	12.4	118	14.0	–
2023	not published	3,575	11,164	26,851	2,141	12.5	133	15.6	–
2022	not published	4,840	15,132	38,503	3,361	11.5	126	16.3	–
2021	not published	3,550	11,103	29,790	2,750	10.8	119	20.1	–
2020	not published	1,944	6,083	16,424	1,358	12.1	118	12.8	–
2019	not published	3,400	10,653	27,774	2,250	12.3	122	16.9	–
2018	not published	2,542	7,990	16,992	1,912	8.9	150	18.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Stolt Tankers BV	14.8	15.0	−1%	715 of 1,460	DNV	B
2024Bio blend	Stolt Tankers BV	14.0	16.7	−16%	519 of 1,274	DNV	B
2023	not published	15.6	16.2	−4%	620 of 1,314	DNV	B
2022	not published	16.3	16.1	+1%	716 of 1,409	DNV	B
2021	not published	20.1	16.7	+20%	851 of 1,343	DNV	B
2020	not published	12.8	16.2	−21%	396 of 1,312	Lloyd's Register	B
2019	not published	16.9	17.3	−2%	637 of 1,321	Lloyd's Register	B
2018	not published	18.8	17.1	+9%	739 of 1,294	Lloyd's Register	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.