Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

SEATROUT

IMO: 9352303
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 19,007 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Bremen
Technical efficiency: EIV 8.46 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TMS "SEATROUT" GmbH & CO. KG

Report year

2023 at a glance

From the 2023 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,285 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

123

Oil tanker median 129 kg/nm (−5%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

22.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 8.44 (+165%)

Average speed

10.6 kn

Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (−4%)

Fuel per day at sea

31.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,131 t

CO₂ emitted

16,185 t

Distance sailed

41,875 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

3,933 h

164 days, 45% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 135 kg/nm · median 129 (+5%)

76.1Ranks 964 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 10.7 (−5%)

8.0Faster than 35% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 22.6 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+184%)

4.51Ranks 1,440 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2023

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports48%
From the EU23%
Into the EU24%
At berth in the EU5%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

871 t

5.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SEATROUT
Oil tanker median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SEATROUT
Oil tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SEATROUT
Oil tanker median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.2 kn	+9%	+7%	−15%	+14%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−0.2 kn	+1%	−1%	−15%	−11%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2022→2023	+3.4 kn	+17%	+72%	−2%	+19%	3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.8 kn	+2%	−33%	−9%	−4%	3.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.6 kn	−7%	−12%	−5%	+3%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	+13%	+11%	−9%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 13%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019	+3.3 kn	+2%	+42%	+1%	+8%	3.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TMS "SEATROUT" GmbH & CO. KG	4,061	12,892	29,998	2,940	10.2	135	22.6	–
2024	TMS "SEATROUT" GmbH & CO. KG	4,379	13,843	35,397	3,391	10.4	124	19.8	–
2023	not published	5,131	16,185	41,875	3,933	10.6	123	22.4	–
2022	not published	4,491	14,206	42,816	5,912	7.2	105	18.9	–
2021	not published	4,846	15,395	47,239	4,286	11.0	103	19.7	49%
2020	not published	5,478	17,303	49,878	4,282	11.6	110	19.2	–
2019	not published	5,352	16,906	54,833	4,644	11.8	97.6	18.8	–
2018	not published	5,205	16,441	54,353	6,397	8.5	95.8	17.4	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TMS "SEATROUT" GmbH & CO. KG	22.6	7.95	+184%	1,440 of 1,665	Verifavia	A
2024	TMS "SEATROUT" GmbH & CO. KG	19.8	8.06	+146%	1,524 of 1,787	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	22.4	8.44	+165%	1,583 of 1,797	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	18.9	8.51	+122%	1,667 of 1,961	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	19.7	8.86	+122%	1,517 of 1,789	ABS	A
2020	not published	19.2	9.03	+112%	1,567 of 1,870	ABS	A
2019	not published	18.8	8.83	+113%	1,610 of 1,919	ABS	A
2018	not published	17.4	8.86	+96%	1,468 of 1,779	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.