Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

SEACOD

IMO: 9352315
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 17,421 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Bremen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.49 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TMS " Seacod" GmbH & Co KG

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 22,544 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

106

Oil tanker median 134 kg/nm (−21%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

14.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Oil tanker median 9.03 (+64%)

Average speed

10.9 kn

Oil tanker median 11.0 kn (−1%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,102 t

CO₂ emitted

16,075 t

Distance sailed

48,149 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,398 h

183 days, 50% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,665 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 119 kg/nm · median 129 (−8%)

76.1Ranks 654 of 1,665, lowest first191

Average speedThis ship 10.8 kn · median 10.7 (+1%)

8.0Faster than 53% of oil tanker ships12.1

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 21.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.95 (+170%)

4.51Ranks 1,425 of 1,665, lowest first27.7

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU40%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU7%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,048 t

6.5% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

SEACOD
Oil tanker median

80.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SEACOD
Oil tanker median

8.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SEACOD
Oil tanker median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	−1%	+5%	−2%	−8%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	+6%	+2%	+4%	+22%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+2.5 kn	+7%	+38%	+19%	+44%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.4 kn	−1%	−29%	−1%	−11%	3.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−0%	+6%	−22%	+1%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	−0.2 kn	−8%	−9%	+3%	−26%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; in line with the speed change.
2018→2019	+1.7 kn	+17%	+39%	−21%	+54%	1.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TMS " Seacod" GmbH & Co KG	5,308	16,721	44,766	4,142	10.8	119	21.4	–
2024	TMS " Seacod" GmbH & Co KG	5,469	17,203	45,795	4,467	10.3	119	23.3	–
2023	not published	4,934	15,567	43,849	4,116	10.7	113	19.2	–
2022	not published	3,886	12,254	36,986	4,492	8.2	105	13.3	–
2021	not published	3,958	12,470	37,439	3,227	11.6	106	15.0	62%
2020	not published	5,102	16,075	48,149	4,398	10.9	106	14.8	–
2019	not published	5,372	16,962	46,700	4,201	11.1	115	19.9	–
2018	not published	5,780	18,196	59,058	6,286	9.4	97.9	12.9	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TMS " Seacod" GmbH & Co KG	21.4	7.95	+170%	1,425 of 1,665	Verifavia	A
2024	TMS " Seacod" GmbH & Co KG	23.3	8.06	+190%	1,574 of 1,787	Verifavia	A
2023	not published	19.2	8.44	+127%	1,520 of 1,797	Verifavia	A
2022	not published	13.3	8.51	+57%	1,465 of 1,961	Verifavia	A
2021	not published	15.0	8.86	+69%	1,376 of 1,789	ABS	A
2020	not published	14.8	9.03	+64%	1,416 of 1,870	ABS	A
2019	not published	19.9	8.83	+125%	1,635 of 1,919	ABS	A
2018	not published	12.9	8.86	+46%	1,288 of 1,779	ABS	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.