Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

DALE

IMO: 9353084
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 12,164 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.32 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: CPO SWEDEN, RIDGEBURY ELVIA B

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Barber Tanker Management GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 12,164 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

91.3 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (+15%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

23.78

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+58%)

Average speed

9.6 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−14%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,579 t

CO₂ emitted

8,172 t

8,298 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

28,249 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,935 h

122 days, 34% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 91.3 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+15%)

52.8Ranks 1,015 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 9.6 kn · median 11.1 (−14%)

8.8Faster than 18% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 23.78 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+58%)

7.93Ranks 1,056 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports55%
From the EU14%
Into the EU16%
At berth in the EU15%

71% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (5,800 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

15.1%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

DALE
Chemical tanker median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

DALE
Chemical tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

DALE
Chemical tanker median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	−3%	−14%	+37%	+10%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	+17%	+24%	−8%	−30%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+1.4 kn	−21%	−9%	−5%	+91%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.0 kn	+7%	−20%	−37%	−15%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.9 kn	−7%	+0%	−10%	+20%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+4.6 kn	−12%	+53%	+7%	−26%	4.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	+4%	+16%	+3%	+36%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Barber Tanker Management GmbH & Co. KG	2,579	8,172	28,249	2,935	9.6	91.3	23.78	–
2024	ZEABORN Ship Management Tanker GmbH & Cie. KG	1,949	6,114	20,639	1,901	10.9	94.4	21.59	–
2023	not published	1,816	5,695	22,437	2,198	10.2	81.0	30.66	–
2022	not published	2,412	7,610	23,624	2,671	8.8	102.1	16.05	–
2021	not published	3,599	11,346	37,737	3,201	11.8	95.4	18.84	–
2020	not published	4,314	13,551	41,841	3,828	10.9	103.1	15.65	–
2019	not published	4,603	14,526	39,244	6,238	6.3	117.3	21.10	–
2018	not published	4,294	13,420	37,945	6,746	5.6	113.2	15.56	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Barber Tanker Management GmbH & Co. KG	23.78	15.04	+58%	1,056 of 1,460	DNV	B
2024	ZEABORN Ship Management Tanker GmbH & Cie. KG	21.59	16.73	+29%	820 of 1,274	DNV	A
2023	not published	30.66	16.23	+89%	1,035 of 1,314	DNV	A+B
2022	not published	16.05	16.06	−0%	702 of 1,409	DNV	A
2021	not published	18.84	16.69	+13%	799 of 1,343	DNV	A
2020	not published	15.65	16.16	−3%	618 of 1,312	DNV	A
2019	not published	21.10	17.32	+22%	847 of 1,321	DNV	A
2018	not published	15.56	17.14	−9%	536 of 1,294	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.