Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

DALE

IMO: 9353084
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 12,164 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.32 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: CPO SWEDEN, RIDGEBURY ELVIA B

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Barber Tanker Management GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 22,729 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

113

Chemical tanker median 90.2 kg/nm (+25%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

15.6

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.1 (−9%)

Average speed

5.6 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (−45%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,294 t

CO₂ emitted

13,420 t

Distance sailed

37,945 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,746 h

281 days, 77% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 91.3 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+15%)

52.8Ranks 1,015 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 9.6 kn · median 11.1 (−14%)

8.8Faster than 18% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 23.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+58%)

7.93Ranks 1,056 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports19%
From the EU31%
Into the EU43%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

837 t

6.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

DALE
Chemical tanker median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0120.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

DALE
Chemical tanker median

4.06.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

DALE
Chemical tanker median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.3 kn	−3%	−14%	+37%	+10%	1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	+17%	+24%	−8%	−30%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 17%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+1.4 kn	−21%	−9%	−5%	+91%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−3.0 kn	+7%	−20%	−37%	−15%	3.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.9 kn	−7%	+0%	−10%	+20%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+4.6 kn	−12%	+53%	+7%	−26%	4.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	+4%	+16%	+3%	+36%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Barber Tanker Management GmbH & Co. KG	2,579	8,172	28,249	2,935	9.6	91.3	23.8	–
2024	ZEABORN Ship Management Tanker GmbH & Cie. KG	1,949	6,114	20,639	1,901	10.9	94.4	21.6	–
2023	not published	1,816	5,695	22,437	2,198	10.2	81.0	30.7	–
2022	not published	2,412	7,610	23,624	2,671	8.8	102	16.1	–
2021	not published	3,599	11,346	37,737	3,201	11.8	95.4	18.8	–
2020	not published	4,314	13,551	41,841	3,828	10.9	103	15.7	–
2019	not published	4,603	14,526	39,244	6,238	6.3	117	21.1	–
2018	not published	4,294	13,420	37,945	6,746	5.6	113	15.6	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Barber Tanker Management GmbH & Co. KG	23.8	15.0	+58%	1,056 of 1,460	DNV	B
2024	ZEABORN Ship Management Tanker GmbH & Cie. KG	21.6	16.7	+29%	820 of 1,274	DNV	A
2023	not published	30.7	16.2	+89%	1,035 of 1,314	DNV	A+B
2022	not published	16.1	16.1	−0%	702 of 1,409	DNV	A
2021	not published	18.8	16.7	+13%	799 of 1,343	DNV	A
2020	not published	15.7	16.2	−3%	618 of 1,312	DNV	A
2019	not published	21.1	17.3	+22%	847 of 1,321	DNV	A
2018	not published	15.6	17.1	−9%	536 of 1,294	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.