Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

CHIP

IMO: 9353101
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 17,973 t
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 5.35 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: CPO FINLAND, RIDGEBURY COLETTE B

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Barber Tanker Management GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2018 at a glance

From the 2018 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 17,839 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

112

Chemical tanker median 90.2 kg/nm (+25%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

19.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 17.1 (+15%)

Average speed

6.5 kn

Chemical tanker median 10.1 kn (−36%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,955 t

CO₂ emitted

12,436 t

Distance sailed

35,225 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,390 h

225 days, 62% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 87.2 kg/nm · median 79.7 (+9%)

52.8Ranks 921 of 1,460, lowest first111

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 11.1 (−2%)

8.8Faster than 44% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 15.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.0 (+2%)

7.93Ranks 752 of 1,460, lowest first40.2

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2018

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports40%
From the EU21%
Into the EU29%
At berth in the EU11%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,327 t

10.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

CHIP
Chemical tanker median

60.080.0100.0120.0140.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

CHIP
Chemical tanker median

6.08.010.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

CHIP
Chemical tanker median

14.016.018.020.022.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.7 kn	−3%	+3%	+11%	−14%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	+0.2 kn	−2%	−0%	+116%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.4 kn	−27%	−35%	+5%	+5%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile down 27%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	+28%	+23%	−50%	−5%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 28%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.0 kn	−5%	+4%	−37%	+8%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+3.7 kn	+8%	+63%	+48%	+12%	3.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.7 kn	−15%	−6%	−10%	−16%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Barber Tanker Management GmbH & Co. KG	3,236	10,235	37,098	3,400	10.9	87.2	15.4	–
2024	ZEABORN Ship Management Tanker GmbH & Cie. KG	3,009	9,487	33,466	3,272	10.2	89.9	17.8	–
2023	not published	1,426	4,487	15,504	1,544	10.0	92.0	20.1	–
2022	not published	1,853	5,837	14,764	1,292	11.4	126	19.2	–
2021	not published	2,912	9,207	29,742	2,508	11.9	97.9	20.2	–
2020	not published	4,836	15,216	46,941	4,323	10.9	103	18.7	–
2019	not published	3,043	9,592	31,759	4,432	7.2	95.8	16.7	–
2018	not published	3,955	12,436	35,225	5,390	6.5	112	19.8	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Barber Tanker Management GmbH & Co. KG	15.4	15.0	+2%	752 of 1,460	DNV	B
2024	ZEABORN Ship Management Tanker GmbH & Cie. KG	17.8	16.7	+6%	691 of 1,274	DNV	A
2023	not published	20.1	16.2	+24%	802 of 1,314	DNV	A+B
2022	not published	19.2	16.1	+20%	841 of 1,409	DNV	A
2021	not published	20.2	16.7	+21%	854 of 1,343	DNV	A
2020	not published	18.7	16.2	+16%	800 of 1,312	DNV	A
2019	not published	16.7	17.3	−4%	624 of 1,321	DNV	A
2018	not published	19.8	17.1	+15%	789 of 1,294	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.