Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

LADY DIVINA

IMO: 9354052
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 9,593 t
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.21 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: KINATSI

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FLORENCE SHIPPING & MARINE SERVICES

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,593 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

53.2 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−36%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

17.53

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+122%)

Average speed

10.2 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (−5%)

Fuel per day at sea

13.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,149 t

CO₂ emitted

3,631 t

3,687 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

21,591 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,120 h

88 days, 24% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 53.2 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−36%)

61.0Ranks 134 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 10.7 (−5%)

8.8Faster than 33% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.53 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+122%)

4.80Ranks 3,310 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports21%
From the EU39%
Into the EU28%
At berth in the EU12%

66% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (2,402 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

11.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

LADY DIVINA
Bulk carrier median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LADY DIVINA
Bulk carrier median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LADY DIVINA
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.1 kn	−19%	−10%	+26%	−13%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.5 kn	+19%	+2%	+71%	+16%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.0 kn	−15%	−23%	−47%	−8%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+6%	+6%	+33%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+7%	+9%	+138%	+105%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	−19%	−11%	−56%	−40%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	+21%	+15%	−51%	+32%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	FLORENCE SHIPPING & MARINE SERVICES	1,149	3,631	21,591	2,120	10.2	53.2	17.53	–
2024	FLORENCE SHIPPING & MARINE SERVICES	1,123	3,515	17,165	1,878	9.1	65.4	20.08	–
2023	not published	553	1,750	10,043	943	10.6	55.1	17.36	–
2022	not published	1,235	3,858	18,964	1,629	11.6	65.1	18.92	–
2021	not published	878	2,774	14,280	1,228	11.6	61.5	23.16	–
2020	not published	344	1,084	5,999	521	11.5	57.3	11.30	–
2019	not published	954	2,996	13,541	1,289	10.5	70.5	18.91	–
2018	not published	1,619	5,080	27,780	2,503	11.1	58.3	14.34	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	FLORENCE SHIPPING & MARINE SERVICES	17.53	7.89	+122%	3,310 of 3,610	Swiss Climate	A
2024	FLORENCE SHIPPING & MARINE SERVICES	20.08	8.09	+148%	2,928 of 3,089	Verum et Accuratus	A
2023	not published	17.36	8.27	+110%	3,193 of 3,548	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	18.92	8.71	+117%	3,674 of 3,968	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	23.16	8.57	+170%	3,365 of 3,466	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	11.30	8.24	+37%	2,454 of 3,150	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	18.91	8.38	+126%	3,165 of 3,360	ClassNK	A
2018	not published	14.34	8.50	+69%	2,941 of 3,384	EMICERT	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.