Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

LADY DIVINA

IMO: 9354052
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 9,593 t
Flag (estimated): Barbados
Port of registry: Bridgetown
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.21 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: KINATSI

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: FLORENCE SHIPPING & MARINE SERVICES

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,701 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

70.5

Bulk carrier median 91.2 kg/nm (−23%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

18.9

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 8.38 (+126%)

Average speed

10.5 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.3 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

954 t

CO₂ emitted

2,996 t

Distance sailed

13,541 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,289 h

54 days, 15% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,611 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 53.2 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−36%)

61.0Ranks 134 of 3,611, lowest first114

Average speedThis ship 10.2 kn · median 10.7 (−5%)

8.8Faster than 33% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 17.5 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.90 (+122%)

4.80Ranks 3,311 of 3,611, lowest first15.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports12%
From the EU58%
Into the EU27%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

67 t

2.2% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

LADY DIVINA
Bulk carrier median

50.060.070.080.090.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

LADY DIVINA
Bulk carrier median

9.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

LADY DIVINA
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+1.1 kn	−19%	−10%	+26%	−13%	1.1 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.5 kn	+19%	+2%	+71%	+16%	1.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.0 kn	−15%	−23%	−47%	−8%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 15%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	+6%	+6%	+33%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+7%	+9%	+138%	+105%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+1.0 kn	−19%	−11%	−56%	−40%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 19%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.6 kn	+21%	+15%	−51%	+32%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 21%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	FLORENCE SHIPPING & MARINE SERVICES	1,149	3,631	21,591	2,120	10.2	53.2	17.5	–
2024	FLORENCE SHIPPING & MARINE SERVICES	1,123	3,515	17,165	1,878	9.1	65.4	20.1	–
2023	not published	553	1,750	10,043	943	10.6	55.1	17.4	–
2022	not published	1,235	3,858	18,964	1,629	11.6	65.1	18.9	–
2021	not published	878	2,774	14,280	1,228	11.6	61.5	23.2	–
2020	not published	344	1,084	5,999	521	11.5	57.3	11.3	–
2019	not published	954	2,996	13,541	1,289	10.5	70.5	18.9	–
2018	not published	1,619	5,080	27,780	2,503	11.1	58.3	14.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	FLORENCE SHIPPING & MARINE SERVICES	17.5	7.90	+122%	3,311 of 3,611	Swiss Climate	A
2024	FLORENCE SHIPPING & MARINE SERVICES	20.1	8.09	+148%	2,928 of 3,089	Verum et Accuratus	A
2023	not published	17.4	8.27	+110%	3,193 of 3,548	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2022	not published	18.9	8.71	+117%	3,674 of 3,968	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	23.2	8.57	+170%	3,365 of 3,466	ClassNK	A
2020	not published	11.3	8.24	+37%	2,454 of 3,150	ClassNK	A
2019	not published	18.9	8.38	+126%	3,165 of 3,360	ClassNK	A
2018	not published	14.3	8.50	+69%	2,941 of 3,384	EMICERT	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.