Navalyze · Bulk carrier · Ship

AFRICAN JACARANDA

IMO: 9354076
Type: Bulk carrier
Average cargo carried: 9,553 t
Port of registry: Monrovia
Technical efficiency: EEXI 7.19 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SEA VISION SHIPPING INC

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 9,553 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

55.0 kg/nm

Bulk carrier median 82.6 kg/nm (−33%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

18.11

g CO₂/t·nm · Bulk carrier median 7.89 (+130%)

Average speed

10.9 kn

Bulk carrier median 10.7 kn (+2%)

Fuel per day at sea

14.4 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,023 t

CO₂ emitted

3,216 t

3,266 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

18,588 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,701 h

71 days, 19% of the year

Within the bulk carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 3,610 bulk carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 55.0 kg/nm · median 82.6 (−33%)

61.0Ranks 162 of 3,610, lowest first114.1

Average speedThis ship 10.9 kn · median 10.7 (+2%)

8.8Faster than 61% of bulk carrier ships11.8

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 18.11 g CO₂/t·nm · median 7.89 (+130%)

4.80Ranks 3,325 of 3,610, lowest first15.93

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Bulk carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU59%
Into the EU38%
At berth in the EU2%

51% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (1,646 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.3%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Bulk carrier median is the middle ship of all bulk carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

AFRICAN JACARANDA
Bulk carrier median

40.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

AFRICAN JACARANDA
Bulk carrier median

7.08.09.010.011.012.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

AFRICAN JACARANDA
Bulk carrier median

5.010.015.020.025.030.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+5%	+5%	+13%	+31%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2023→2024	+0.8 kn	−8%	−1%	−51%	−36%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.8 kn	+1%	−6%	+262%	−14%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.3 kn	+1%	+3%	+2%	+34%	0.3 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	−0%	−9%	+30%	−31%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.7 kn	−3%	+44%	−65%	+21%	3.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.9 kn	+20%	−4%	+4%	+59%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 20%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	SEA VISION SHIPPING INC	1,023	3,216	18,588	1,701	10.9	55.0	18.11	–
2024	SEA VISION SHIPPING INC	862	2,703	16,451	1,514	10.9	52.4	13.83	–
2023	not published	1,925	6,046	33,628	3,322	10.1	57.2	21.52	–
2022	not published	527	1,657	9,301	857	10.9	56.7	24.97	–
2021	not published	514	1,622	9,106	857	10.6	56.4	18.69	–
2020	not published	397	1,240	7,029	604	11.6	56.5	27.22	–
2019	not published	1,180	3,700	20,285	2,583	7.9	58.2	22.44	–
2018	not published	941	2,954	19,471	1,984	9.8	48.3	14.12	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Bulk carrier median	vs Bulk carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SEA VISION SHIPPING INC	18.11	7.89	+130%	3,325 of 3,610	ICS Verification Services	A
2024	SEA VISION SHIPPING INC	13.83	8.09	+71%	2,678 of 3,089	ICS Verification Services	A
2023	not published	21.52	8.27	+160%	3,342 of 3,548	ICS Verification Services	A
2022	not published	24.97	8.71	+187%	3,825 of 3,968	ICS Verification Services	A
2021	not published	18.69	8.57	+118%	3,265 of 3,466	ICS Verification Services	A
2020	not published	27.22	8.24	+230%	3,100 of 3,150	ICS Verification Services	A
2019	not published	22.44	8.38	+168%	3,239 of 3,360	ICS Verification Services	A
2018	not published	14.12	8.50	+66%	2,924 of 3,384	ICS Verification Services	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Bulk carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's bulk carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.