Navalyze · Container · Ship

X-PRESS SOUSSE

IMO: 9354349
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,358 t
Flag (estimated): Morocco
Port of registry: Tangier
Technical efficiency: EEXI 23.90 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: X-PRESS ETNA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.

Report year

2021 at a glance

From the 2021 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,123 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

80.9

Container median 186 kg/nm (−56%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

41.2

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.9 (+130%)

Average speed

10.7 kn

Container median 14.1 kn (−24%)

Fuel per day at sea

20.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

981 t

CO₂ emitted

3,062 t

Distance sailed

12,125 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,130 h

47 days, 13% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 73.5 kg/nm · median 177 (−58%)

78.8Ranks 150 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 5.2 kn · median 13.3 (−61%)

9.1Faster than 1% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 42.9 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+163%)

7.22Ranks 1,932 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2021

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports29%
From the EU33%
Into the EU34%
At berth in the EU4%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

118 t

3.9% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

X-PRESS SOUSSE
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

X-PRESS SOUSSE
Container median

5.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

X-PRESS SOUSSE
Container median

0.020.040.060.080.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−2.9 kn	−3%	−38%	−74%	−34%	2.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 3%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	−1.0 kn	+9%	−2%	+36%	+33%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	+2%	−14%	+208%	+42%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.0 kn	−16%	−16%	−46%	−16%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+1.4 kn	+4%	+20%	−40%	−10%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.1 kn	+4%	+33%	−32%	−15%	2.1 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.9 kn	−2%	−12%	−1%	–	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	529	1,654	7,196	1,379	5.2	73.5	42.9	98%
2024	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	2,075	6,486	27,409	3,371	8.1	75.7	65.1	92%
2023	not published	1,404	4,432	20,203	2,228	9.1	69.5	48.9	–
2022	not published	449	1,400	6,570	614	10.7	68.3	34.5	–
2021	not published	981	3,062	12,125	1,130	10.7	80.9	41.2	–
2020	not published	1,573	4,907	20,261	2,180	9.3	77.6	45.6	–
2019	not published	2,226	6,953	29,738	4,103	7.2	74.9	53.5	–
2018	not published	2,288	7,150	29,920	3,715	8.1	76.5	39,720,639	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	42.9	16.3	+163%	1,932 of 2,208	ABS	A
2024	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	65.1	17.5	+272%	1,885 of 1,974	ABS	A
2023	not published	48.9	19.4	+152%	1,662 of 1,899	Korean Register	A
2022	not published	34.5	19.1	+81%	1,392 of 1,825	Korean Register	A
2021	not published	41.2	17.9	+130%	1,498 of 1,781	Korean Register	A
2020	not published	45.6	17.6	+159%	1,554 of 1,797	Korean Register	A
2019	not published	53.5	18.9	+183%	1,590 of 1,788	Korean Register	A
2018	not published	–	–	–	–	Bureau Veritas	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.