Navalyze · Container · Ship

X-PRESS TAGUS

IMO: 9354375
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 6,591 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 25.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: ARA ATLANTIS, ATLANTIS A

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,067 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

74.9

Container median 174 kg/nm (−57%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

38.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+106%)

Average speed

9.5 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−31%)

Fuel per day at sea

17.0 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,247 t

CO₂ emitted

13,360 t

Distance sailed

56,715 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,987 h

249 days, 68% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 77.7 kg/nm · median 177 (−56%)

78.8Ranks 205 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 13.3 (−14%)

9.1Faster than 26% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 36.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+126%)

7.22Ranks 1,822 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports91%
From the EU1%
Into the EU2%
At berth in the EU6%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

810 t

6.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

X-PRESS TAGUS
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

X-PRESS TAGUS
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

X-PRESS TAGUS
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.9 kn	−7%	−14%	−4%	−9%	0.9 kn slower, fuel per mile down 7%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.6 kn	+8%	+24%	−5%	+5%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile up 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.1 kn	+4%	+3%	−11%	−18%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−2%	−5%	+6%	+12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.2 kn	+0%	−1%	−4%	+24%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2019→2020	+1.9 kn	+1%	+23%	−11%	−13%	1.9 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−5.0 kn	+15%	−25%	−22%	−2%	5.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	3,234	10,108	41,631	3,634	11.5	77.7	36.8	87%
2024	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	3,619	11,347	43,322	3,502	12.4	83.5	40.5	80%
2023	not published	3,536	11,070	45,773	4,251	10.8	77.2	38.5	–
2022	not published	3,807	11,986	51,183	4,684	10.9	74.4	46.7	–
2021	not published	3,677	11,517	48,229	4,290	11.2	76.2	41.6	–
2020	not published	3,836	12,108	50,441	4,416	11.4	76.0	33.7	–
2019	not published	4,247	13,360	56,715	5,987	9.5	74.9	38.8	–
2018	not published	4,754	14,988	73,053	5,032	14.5	65.1	39.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	36.8	16.3	+126%	1,822 of 2,208	ABS	A
2024	Eastaway Ship Management PTE. LTD.	40.5	17.5	+131%	1,627 of 1,974	ABS	A
2023	not published	38.5	19.4	+98%	1,519 of 1,899	Korean Register	A
2022	not published	46.7	19.1	+144%	1,566 of 1,825	Korean Register	A
2021	not published	41.6	17.9	+132%	1,500 of 1,781	Korean Register	A
2020	not published	33.7	17.6	+91%	1,389 of 1,797	Verifavia	B+C
2019	not published	38.8	18.9	+106%	1,398 of 1,788	Verifavia	B+C
2018	not published	39.7	20.2	+96%	1,344 of 1,705	Verifavia	B+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.