Navalyze · Container · Ship

DAGMAR

IMO: 9354399
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,222 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 24.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: BUXTEHUDE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: MS “Dagmar” Schifffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,424 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

71.6

Container median 178 kg/nm (−60%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

41.8

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+118%)

Average speed

12.6 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (−7%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

3,630 t

CO₂ emitted

11,487 t

Distance sailed

50,706 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,038 h

168 days, 46% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 77.0 kg/nm · median 177 (−56%)

78.8Ranks 197 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.8 kn · median 13.3 (−11%)

9.1Faster than 29% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 46.1 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+183%)

7.22Ranks 1,978 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports82%
From the EU5%
Into the EU4%
At berth in the EU10%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,196 t

10.4% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

DAGMAR
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

DAGMAR
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

DAGMAR
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.1 kn	+2%	+3%	−11%	+19%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	+0.7 kn	+4%	+10%	+14%	−1%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−1.6 kn	+2%	−11%	+4%	−7%	1.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+0.1 kn	−9%	−9%	−7%	−0%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	+0.1 kn	+19%	+20%	−32%	−6%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+4.4 kn	−17%	+29%	+109%	−6%	4.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.2 kn	−1%	−14%	+5%	−6%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	MS “Dagmar” Schifffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	4,103	12,838	53,311	4,522	11.8	77.0	46.1	100%
2024	MS “Dagmar” Schifffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	4,527	14,127	59,827	5,131	11.7	75.7	38.7	–
2023	not published	3,836	11,976	52,638	4,802	11.0	72.9	39.1	–
2022	not published	3,630	11,487	50,706	4,038	12.6	71.6	41.8	–
2021	not published	4,303	13,581	54,627	4,358	12.5	78.8	41.9	–
2020	not published	5,332	16,819	80,468	6,479	12.4	66.3	44.4	–
2019	not published	3,075	9,609	38,496	4,827	8.0	79.9	47.0	–
2018	not published	2,958	9,250	36,733	3,986	9.2	80.5	50.2	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	MS “Dagmar” Schifffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	46.1	16.3	+183%	1,978 of 2,208	RINA	B
2024	MS “Dagmar” Schifffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	38.7	17.5	+121%	1,605 of 1,974	RINA	B
2023	not published	39.1	19.4	+101%	1,529 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	B
2022	not published	41.8	19.1	+118%	1,504 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	41.9	17.9	+134%	1,507 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	44.4	17.6	+153%	1,531 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	47.0	18.9	+149%	1,504 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	50.2	20.2	+148%	1,487 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.