Navalyze · Container · Ship

HENNEKE RAMBOW

IMO: 9354430
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 4,820 t
Flag (estimated): Germany
Port of registry: Hamburg
Technical efficiency: EEXI 24.79 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Reederei Rambow GmbH & Co. KG MS ”Henneke Rambow”

Report year

2022 at a glance

From the 2022 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,709 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

80.2

Container median 178 kg/nm (−55%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

44.5

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 19.1 (+133%)

Average speed

14.2 kn

Container median 13.6 kn (+4%)

Fuel per day at sea

27.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,902 t

CO₂ emitted

18,713 t

Distance sailed

73,631 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,184 h

216 days, 59% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 66.0 kg/nm · median 177 (−63%)

78.8Ranks 73 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 13.3 kn · median 13.3 (+0%)

9.1Faster than 49% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 43.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+165%)

7.22Ranks 1,939 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2022

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports39%
From the EU42%
Into the EU16%
At berth in the EU3%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

616 t

3.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

HENNEKE RAMBOW
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

HENNEKE RAMBOW
Container median

13.013.514.014.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

HENNEKE RAMBOW
Container median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.0 kn	−6%	−13%	+0%	+0%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	−14%	−11%	−17%	−24%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.3 kn	+1%	−1%	+3%	+28%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−0.3 kn	−5%	−7%	−10%	−17%	0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 5%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	−0.1 kn	+2%	+2%	−6%	+2%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 2%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.8 kn	−5%	+1%	+4%	+9%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.0 kn	+1%	+1%	+1%	+3%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Reederei Rambow GmbH & Co. KG MS ”Henneke Rambow”	4,133	13,035	62,599	4,715	13.3	66.0	43.2	100%
2024	Reederei Rambow GmbH & Co. KG MS ”Henneke Rambow”	4,369	13,817	62,413	4,361	14.3	70.0	43.1	–
2023	not published	6,125	19,313	75,571	5,451	13.9	81.0	57.1	–
2022	not published	5,902	18,713	73,631	5,184	14.2	80.2	44.5	–
2021	not published	6,931	21,983	81,956	5,651	14.5	84.6	53.4	–
2020	not published	7,224	22,925	87,454	6,009	14.6	82.6	52.2	–
2019	not published	7,312	23,002	84,406	6,107	13.8	86.6	48.0	–
2018	not published	7,164	22,588	83,499	6,048	13.8	85.8	46.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Reederei Rambow GmbH & Co. KG MS ”Henneke Rambow”	43.2	16.3	+165%	1,939 of 2,208	RINA	B
2024	Reederei Rambow GmbH & Co. KG MS ”Henneke Rambow”	43.1	17.5	+146%	1,660 of 1,974	RINA	B
2023	not published	57.1	19.4	+194%	1,760 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	B
2022	not published	44.5	19.1	+133%	1,540 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	53.4	17.9	+198%	1,635 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	52.2	17.6	+197%	1,617 of 1,797	RINA	A
2019	not published	48.0	18.9	+154%	1,518 of 1,788	RINA	A
2018	not published	46.7	20.2	+131%	1,437 of 1,705	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.