Navalyze

Navalyze · Container · Ship

BALTIC WHALE

IMO
9354454
Type
Container ship
Average cargo carried
5,300 t
Flag (estimated)
Antigua and Barbuda
Port of registry
St. John`S
Technical efficiency
EEXI 25.05 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class
IA
Former names
JOANNA BORCHARD, JSP ANNA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Invicont OU

?
?

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 6,129 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm
82.8
Container median 174 kg/nm (−53%)
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)
42.1
g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+123%)
Average speed
13.1 kn
Container median 13.7 kn (−4%)
Fuel per day at sea
26.1 t/day
Fuel consumed
6,827 t
CO₂ emitted
21,274 t
Distance sailed
82,424 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
6,269 h
261 days, 72% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 66.6 kg/nm · median 177 (−62%)
78.8Ranks 75 of 2,208, lowest first302
Average speedThis ship 11.5 kn · median 13.3 (−14%)
9.1Faster than 26% of container ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 40.2 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+147%)
7.22Ranks 1,879 of 2,208, lowest first46.9
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports50%
  • From the EU24%
  • Into the EU24%
  • At berth in the EU2%
Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
330 t
1.6% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
–
Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol
CO₂eq uplift
–
CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

  • BALTIC WHALE
  • Container median

Average speed, kn

  • BALTIC WHALE
  • Container median

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

  • BALTIC WHALE
  • Container median

Year on year

YearAverage speedFuel kg/nmFuel per day at seaDistanceCO₂ per transport workReading
2024→2025−0.6 kn−17%−21%+55%−23%0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024−0.2 kn+11%+10%−0%−1%Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023−0.7 kn−6%−11%+9%+29%0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022+1.5 kn+12%+26%−3%+6%1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021−0.3 kn−14%−16%−43%−6%0.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020−1.3 kn−4%−14%−21%−2%1.3 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2018→2019+0.1 kn+0%+2%+7%−13%Same speed, fuel per mile flat.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmHours at seahAverage speedknots at seaFuel kg/nmthis shipCO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this shipLaden fuel
2025part-yearInvicont OU2,5438,15440,1583,58711.263.344.2–
2025part-yearMS 'JSP Anna' Schifffahrts UG (haftungsbeschraenkt) & Co. KG1,0523,34313,6211,08412.677.336.4–
2025Cloud Ship Management DMCC4,07713,04161,2205,30711.566.640.2–
2024MS 'JSP Anna' Schifffahrts UG (haftungsbeschraenkt) & Co. KG3,1669,99839,4913,25212.180.252.5–
2023not published2,8679,10439,6483,23612.372.353.1–
2022not published2,7998,90736,4822,81613.076.741.2–
2021not published2,5698,19937,5073,26811.568.538.9–
2020not published5,19416,30165,4305,53811.879.441.2–
2019not published6,82721,27482,4246,26913.182.842.1–
2018not published6,34319,76876,9175,92313.082.548.6100%

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nmContainer medianvs ContainerRankVerifierMethods
2025part-yearInvicont OU––––VerifaviaA
2025part-yearMS 'JSP Anna' Schifffahrts UG (haftungsbeschraenkt) & Co. KG––––Swiss ClimateA
2025Cloud Ship Management DMCC40.216.3+147%1,879 of 2,208RINAA
2024MS 'JSP Anna' Schifffahrts UG (haftungsbeschraenkt) & Co. KG52.517.5+199%1,796 of 1,974Swiss ClimateA
2023not published53.119.4+174%1,720 of 1,899Swiss ClimateA
2022not published41.219.1+115%1,498 of 1,825Swiss ClimateA
2021not published38.917.9+117%1,468 of 1,781Swiss ClimateA
2020not published41.217.6+134%1,490 of 1,797Bureau VeritasA
2019not published42.118.9+123%1,457 of 1,788Bureau VeritasA
2018not published48.620.2+140%1,461 of 1,705Bureau VeritasA

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.