Navalyze · Container · Ship

EMILY BORCHARD

IMO: 9354466
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 5,203 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EIV 29.80 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: HELMUT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TTS Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 5,203 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

67.5 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−62%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

40.54

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+149%)

Average speed

12.3 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−8%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.9 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,744 t

CO₂ emitted

5,446 t

5,532 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

25,819 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,101 h

88 days, 24% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 67.5 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−62%)

78.8Ranks 86 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 12.3 kn · median 13.3 (−8%)

9.1Faster than 34% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 40.54 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+149%)

7.22Ranks 1,881 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports39%
From the EU26%
Into the EU33%
At berth in the EU2%

71% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,841 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.5%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

EMILY BORCHARD
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EMILY BORCHARD
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EMILY BORCHARD
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.5 kn	−15%	−12%	−47%	−5%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.3 kn	+11%	+8%	−5%	−15%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 11%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	+0%	+7%	+0%	+12%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.8 kn	−12%	−18%	+25%	−3%	0.8 kn slower, fuel per mile down 12%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.7 kn	−1%	+5%	−9%	−3%	0.7 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.5 kn	−10%	+15%	−11%	+0%	2.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.4 kn	+6%	−8%	−17%	+15%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	TTS Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	1,744	5,446	25,819	2,101	12.3	67.5	40.54	–
2024	TTS Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	3,871	12,294	48,629	4,123	11.8	79.6	42.78	–
2023	not published	3,660	11,624	51,187	4,225	12.1	71.5	50.46	–
2022	not published	3,644	11,648	50,966	4,497	11.3	71.5	45.04	–
2021	not published	3,315	10,517	40,852	3,377	12.1	81.2	46.34	–
2020	not published	3,667	11,593	44,831	3,919	11.4	81.8	47.68	–
2019	not published	4,595	14,346	50,582	5,666	8.9	90.8	47.64	–
2018	not published	5,234	16,327	61,010	5,907	10.3	85.8	41.45	100%

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TTS Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	40.54	16.30	+149%	1,881 of 2,208	EnvService	B
2024	TTS Schifffahrts GmbH & Co. KG	42.78	17.52	+144%	1,656 of 1,974	EnvService	B
2023	not published	50.46	19.40	+160%	1,688 of 1,899	EnvService	B
2022	not published	45.04	19.13	+135%	1,546 of 1,825	EnvService	B
2021	not published	46.34	17.90	+159%	1,553 of 1,781	EnvService	B
2020	not published	47.68	17.58	+171%	1,576 of 1,797	EnvService	B
2019	not published	47.64	18.88	+152%	1,514 of 1,788	EnvService	B
2018	not published	41.45	20.22	+105%	1,373 of 1,705	EnvService	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.