Navalyze

Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

TANGGUH PALUNG

IMO
9355379
Type
LNG carrier
Port of registry
Panama
Technical efficiency
EIV 4.76 g CO₂/t·nm
Fuel
Mostly LNG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2024: K MARINE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.

?

2024 at a glance

From the 2024 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel per mile
254.6 kg/nm
CO₂ per transport work (volume)
–
g CO₂/m³·nm
Average speed
16.3 kn
Fuel per day at sea
99.4 t/day
Fuel consumed
4,458 t
CO₂ emitted
11,969 t
15,825 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O
Distance sailed
17,513 nm
CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile
Time at sea
1,076 h
45 days, 12% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2023

Set against all 355 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2023 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 322.4 kg/nm · median 230.7 (+40%)
166.5Ranks 270 of 355, lowest first358.9
Average speedThis ship 12.9 kn · median 14.2 (−9%)
10.7Faster than 28% of LNG carrier ships16.0
CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 8.50 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 9.10 (−7%)
5.47Ranks 164 of 355, lowest first17.94
Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2024

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

  • Between EU ports0%
  • From the EU27%
  • Into the EU73%
  • At berth in the EU0%

50% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,039 t).

Fuel burned laden
–
Not reported
CO₂ at berth
0.0%
Alongside in EU ports
Methane (CH₄)
133.1 t
LNG engines slip unburnt methane
CO₂eq ÷ CO₂
1.322
Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

  • TANGGUH PALUNG
  • LNG carrier median

Average speed, kn

  • TANGGUH PALUNG
  • LNG carrier median

Year on year

YearSpeedFuel per mileFuel per dayDistanceCO₂ per TWReading
2023→2024+3.4 kn−21%−0%+159%–3.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 21%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

YearISM companyFuel tCO₂ tDistance nmAt sea hSpeed knFuel kg/nmCO₂ g/t·nmLaden fuel
2024LNGK MARINE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.4,45811,96917,5131,07616.3254.6––
2023LNGnot published2,1816,0496,76552612.9322.4––

Benchmark and verification

YearISM companyCO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nmLNG carrier medianvs LNG carrierRankVerifierMethods
2024LNGK MARINE SHIP MANAGEMENT PTE. LTD.––––ClassNKB+C
2023LNGnot published8.509.10−7%164 of 355ClassNKB+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.

TANGGUH PALUNG (IMO 9355379): fuel, emissions and EU ETS 2023–2024 | Navalyze