Navalyze · Container · Ship

SUNAID X

IMO: 9358539
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 3,634 t
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 30.79 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: MAX PRIDE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Kontor 17 MPM GmbH

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 3,634 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

67.1 kg/nm

Container median 177.0 kg/nm (−62%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

58.50

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 16.30 (+259%)

Average speed

9.7 kn

Container median 13.3 kn (−27%)

Fuel per day at sea

15.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

2,609 t

CO₂ emitted

8,263 t

8,391 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

38,874 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

4,007 h

167 days, 46% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 67.1 kg/nm · median 177.0 (−62%)

78.8Ranks 82 of 2,208, lowest first302.4

Average speedThis ship 9.7 kn · median 13.3 (−27%)

9.1Faster than 14% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 58.50 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.30 (+259%)

7.22Ranks 2,102 of 2,208, lowest first46.89

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports52%
From the EU26%
Into the EU19%
At berth in the EU3%

78% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (6,414 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

2.8%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.015

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SUNAID X
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SUNAID X
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SUNAID X
Container median

0.025.050.075.0100125

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+0.8 kn	−16%	−8%	+19%	−20%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−1.9 kn	+23%	+1%	−29%	−9%	1.9 kn slower, fuel per mile up 23%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	+9%	+2%	+44%	+39%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 9%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	+1.6 kn	−16%	−3%	+12%	−44%	1.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 16%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−2.6 kn	+8%	−15%	+82%	+160%	2.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+2.3 kn	−17%	+2%	−70%	−58%	2.3 kn faster, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−1.4 kn	+2%	−11%	−22%	+26%	1.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	2,609	8,263	38,874	4,007	9.7	67.1	58.50	–
2024	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	2,613	8,167	32,640	3,683	8.9	80.0	72.75	–
2023	not published	2,968	9,269	45,814	4,244	10.8	64.8	80.10	–
2022	not published	1,896	5,982	31,867	2,778	11.5	59.5	57.42	–
2021	not published	2,017	6,363	28,363	2,856	9.9	71.1	102.17	–
2020	not published	1,023	3,231	15,565	1,242	12.5	65.7	39.31	–
2019	not published	4,093	12,792	51,586	5,068	10.2	79.3	94.66	–
2018	not published	5,178	16,169	66,332	5,702	11.6	78.1	74.86	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	58.50	16.30	+259%	2,102 of 2,208	DNV	A+C
2024	Kontor 17 MPM GmbH	72.75	17.52	+315%	1,915 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	80.10	19.40	+313%	1,878 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	57.42	19.13	+200%	1,686 of 1,825	DNV	B
2021	not published	102.17	17.90	+471%	1,776 of 1,781	DNV	B
2020	not published	39.31	17.58	+124%	1,468 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	94.66	18.88	+401%	1,774 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	74.86	20.22	+270%	1,639 of 1,705	RINA	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.