Navalyze · Container · Ship

EMOTION

IMO: 9359258
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 9,709 t
Flag (estimated): Netherlands
Port of registry: Harlingen
Technical efficiency: EEXI 19.00 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: m.s. Emotion Bewaarder B.V.

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 11,091 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

98.2

Container median 174 kg/nm (−44%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

28.0

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+48%)

Average speed

9.0 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−34%)

Fuel per day at sea

21.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

5,346 t

CO₂ emitted

16,867 t

Distance sailed

54,410 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

6,022 h

251 days, 69% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 96.7 kg/nm · median 177 (−45%)

78.8Ranks 497 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.9 kn · median 13.3 (−11%)

9.1Faster than 30% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 31.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+93%)

7.22Ranks 1,718 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports91%
From the EU0%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU9%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,567 t

9.3% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

EMOTION
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EMOTION
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EMOTION
Container median

15.020.025.030.035.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.4 kn	+2%	−1%	+2%	+10%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	+5%	+9%	+11%	+2%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 5%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+0.5 kn	−4%	+0%	−7%	−7%	0.5 kn faster, fuel per mile down 4%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−6%	−10%	+3%	+5%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 6%; in line with the speed change.
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	−8%	−7%	−4%	−7%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+2.7 kn	+10%	+43%	−1%	+11%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile up 10%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.7 kn	−4%	−32%	−17%	+6%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	m.s. Emotion Bewaarder B.V.	5,377	16,945	55,618	4,660	11.9	96.7	31.4	–
2024	m.s. Emotion Bewaarder B.V.	5,162	16,178	54,551	4,438	12.3	94.6	28.6	–
2023	not published	4,427	14,079	49,204	4,145	11.9	90.0	28.2	–
2022	not published	4,950	15,630	52,977	4,653	11.4	93.4	30.2	–
2021	not published	5,152	16,253	51,671	4,358	11.9	99.7	28.8	–
2020	not published	5,858	18,482	54,000	4,622	11.7	109	31.1	–
2019	not published	5,346	16,867	54,410	6,022	9.0	98.2	28.0	–
2018	not published	6,710	21,164	65,318	5,143	12.7	103	26.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	m.s. Emotion Bewaarder B.V.	31.4	16.3	+93%	1,718 of 2,208	DNV	A
2024	m.s. Emotion Bewaarder B.V.	28.6	17.5	+63%	1,421 of 1,974	DNV	A
2023	not published	28.2	19.4	+45%	1,303 of 1,899	DNV	A
2022	not published	30.2	19.1	+58%	1,303 of 1,825	DNV	A
2021	not published	28.8	17.9	+61%	1,272 of 1,781	DNV	A
2020	not published	31.1	17.6	+77%	1,353 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	28.0	18.9	+48%	1,205 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	26.3	20.2	+30%	1,079 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.