Navalyze · Container · Ship

JUDITH

IMO: 9359260
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 10,259 t
Flag (estimated): Cyprus
Port of registry: Limassol
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.97 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: CHRISTOPHER

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: Zweite UFR Schifffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG

Report year

2019 at a glance

From the 2019 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 10,463 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

74.4

Container median 174 kg/nm (−57%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

22.4

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 18.9 (+19%)

Average speed

10.8 kn

Container median 13.7 kn (−21%)

Fuel per day at sea

19.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

4,385 t

CO₂ emitted

13,817 t

Distance sailed

58,930 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,445 h

227 days, 62% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 83.4 kg/nm · median 177 (−53%)

78.8Ranks 300 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 11.8 kn · median 13.3 (−11%)

9.1Faster than 29% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 51.4 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+215%)

7.22Ranks 2,038 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2019

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports67%
From the EU19%
Into the EU6%
At berth in the EU8%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

1,123 t

8.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

JUDITH
Container median

50.0100.0150.0200.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

JUDITH
Container median

10.011.012.013.014.015.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

JUDITH
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	+0.0 kn	+1%	+2%	+0%	+90%	Same speed, fuel per mile flat.
2023→2024	−0.4 kn	−1%	−4%	+3%	−0%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	+1%	+8%	+4%	+2%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.5 kn	−0%	−5%	+0%	+7%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+0.2 kn	+4%	+6%	−11%	−3%	Same speed, fuel per mile up 4%; in line with the speed change.
2019→2020	+0.9 kn	+7%	+15%	−0%	+14%	0.9 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	+0.1 kn	−8%	−6%	−4%	−1%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 8%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	Zweite UFR Schifffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	4,652	29,410	55,760	4,720	11.8	83.4	51.4	100%
2024	Zweite UFR Schifffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	4,574	14,508	55,611	4,726	11.8	82.2	27.1	–
2023	not published	4,480	14,194	54,197	4,447	12.2	82.7	27.1	–
2022	not published	4,296	13,586	52,314	4,608	11.4	82.1	26.6	–
2021	not published	4,302	13,578	52,251	4,396	11.9	82.3	24.7	–
2020	not published	4,659	14,698	58,643	5,033	11.7	79.5	25.5	–
2019	not published	4,385	13,817	58,930	5,445	10.8	74.4	22.4	–
2018	not published	4,934	15,558	61,330	5,738	10.7	80.5	22.7	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	Zweite UFR Schifffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	51.4	16.3	+215%	2,038 of 2,208	RINA	B
2024	Zweite UFR Schifffahrtsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG	27.1	17.5	+55%	1,384 of 1,974	RINA	B
2023	not published	27.1	19.4	+40%	1,265 of 1,899	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	B
2022	not published	26.6	19.1	+39%	1,199 of 1,825	Dromon Bureau of Shipping	A
2021	not published	24.7	17.9	+38%	1,174 of 1,781	RINA	A
2020	not published	25.5	17.6	+45%	1,236 of 1,797	DNV	A
2019	not published	22.4	18.9	+19%	1,048 of 1,788	DNV	A
2018	not published	22.7	20.2	+12%	962 of 1,705	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.