Navalyze · Other · Ship

BAHIJAH

IMO: 9360788
Type: Other ship types
Average cargo carried: 742 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EIV 30.21 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: BASSEM DABBAH Shipping Inc.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 742 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

101.3 kg/nm

Other median 87.2 kg/nm (+16%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

426

g CO₂/t·nm · Other median 86.69 (+392%)

Average speed

15.1 kn

Other median 10.4 kn (+45%)

Fuel per day at sea

36.8 t/day

Fuel consumed

1,874 t

CO₂ emitted

5,855 t

5,947 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

18,505 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,223 h

51 days, 14% of the year

Within the other fleet, 2025

Set against all 159 other ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 101.3 kg/nm · median 87.2 (+16%)

47.6Ranks 93 of 159, lowest first160.7

Average speedThis ship 15.1 kn · median 10.4 (+45%)

5.8Faster than 92% of other ships13.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 426.25 g CO₂/t·nm · median 86.69 (+392%)

30.78Ranks 138 of 159, lowest first600.46

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Other medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU47%
Into the EU45%
At berth in the EU8%

55% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (3,223 t).

Fuel burned laden

51%

49% in ballast or unladen

CO₂ at berth

7.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.1 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Other median is the middle ship of all other ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

BAHIJAH
Other median

70.080.090.0100.0110.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

BAHIJAH
Other median

10.012.014.016.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

BAHIJAH
Other median

0.0200400600

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	+1.5 kn	+13%	+26%	−37%	−29%	1.5 kn faster, fuel per mile up 13%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2023→2024	−0.5 kn	−2%	−5%	−23%	+68%	0.5 kn slower, fuel per mile down 2%; in line with the speed change.
2022→2023	+1.2 kn	−6%	+2%	−26%	−22%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	−0.6 kn	+0%	−4%	+7%	+8%	0.6 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−1.0 kn	+5%	−2%	+2%	+15%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 5%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+0.6 kn	−12%	−8%	+98%	−14%	0.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 12%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.4 kn	+4%	+1%	−15%	+2%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	BASSEM DABBAH Shipping Inc.	1,874	5,855	18,505	1,223	15.1	101.3	426.25	51%
2024	BASSEM DABBAH Shipping Inc.	2,614	8,154	29,268	2,145	13.6	89.3	596.54	–
2023	not published	3,458	10,781	37,866	2,691	14.1	91.3	355.54	–
2022	not published	4,992	15,564	51,279	3,961	12.9	97.3	455.15	–
2021	not published	4,654	14,517	48,017	3,546	13.5	96.9	420.31	–
2020	not published	4,376	13,643	47,180	3,258	14.5	92.7	364.12	–
2019	not published	2,495	7,780	23,792	1,712	13.9	104.9	423.59	–
2018	not published	2,832	8,831	28,151	1,967	14.3	100.6	415.43	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Other median	vs Other	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	BASSEM DABBAH Shipping Inc.	426.25	86.69	+392%	138 of 159	Bureau Veritas	A
2024	BASSEM DABBAH Shipping Inc.	596.54	51.55	+1,057%	181 of 189	Bureau Veritas	A
2023	not published	355.54	93.54	+280%	107 of 116	RINA	A
2022	not published	455.15	74.09	+514%	64 of 78	RINA	A
2021	not published	420.31	159.48	+164%	60 of 72	RINA	A
2020	not published	364.12	120.71	+202%	72 of 81	RINA	A
2019	not published	423.59	90.12	+370%	86 of 96	RINA	A
2018	not published	415.43	72.88	+470%	77 of 87	RINA	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Other ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's other ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.