Navalyze · LNG carrier · Ship

UMM AL AMAD

IMO: 9360829
Type: LNG carrier
Flag (estimated): Marshall Islands
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 6.13 g CO₂/t·nm

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: ''K'' Line Energy Shipping (UK) Limited

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report.

Fuel kg/nm

321

LNG carrier median 297 kg/nm (+8%)

CO₂ per transport work (volume)

9.72

g CO₂/m³·nm · LNG carrier median 10.7 (−9%)

Average speed

15.5 kn

LNG carrier median 14.7 kn (+5%)

Fuel per day at sea

119.6 t/day

Fuel consumed

12,293 t

CO₂ emitted

38,331 t

Distance sailed

38,324 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

2,466 h

103 days, 28% of the year

Within the LNG carrier fleet, 2025

Set against all 386 LNG carrier ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 303 kg/nm · median 190 (+59%)

152Ranks 329 of 386, lowest first319

Average speedThis ship 14.9 kn · median 14.4 (+3%)

11.2Faster than 62% of LNG carrier ships15.9

CO₂ per transport work (volume)This ship 7.74 g CO₂/m³·nm · median 7.12 (+9%)

5.06Ranks 220 of 386, lowest first16.1

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%LNG carrier medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU48%
Into the EU50%
At berth in the EU2%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

655 t

1.7% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The LNG carrier median is the middle ship of all LNG carrier ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

UMM AL AMAD
LNG carrier median

150.0200.0250.0300.0350.0400.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

UMM AL AMAD
LNG carrier median

11.012.013.014.015.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (volume), g CO₂/m³·nm

UMM AL AMAD
LNG carrier median

6.08.010.012.014.016.0

’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−0.7 kn	+6%	+2%	−18%	−9%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 6%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.3 kn	−17%	−16%	+274%	−37%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 17%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	+0.8 kn	−5%	+1%	−51%	−4%	0.8 kn faster, fuel per mile down 5%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2021→2022	+2.7 kn	−6%	+16%	+445%	+129%	2.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−3.7 kn	+19%	−9%	−81%	−36%	3.7 kn slower, fuel per mile up 19%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+3.6 kn	−7%	+21%	+8%	−18%	3.6 kn faster, fuel per mile down 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	''K'' Line Energy Shipping (UK) Limited	17,856	55,489	58,994	3,957	14.9	303	–	–
2024Bio blend	K Line LNG Shipping UK Ltd.	20,505	63,540	72,089	4,633	15.6	284	–	–
2023	not published	6,621	20,724	19,267	1,258	15.3	344	–	–
2022	not published	14,260	44,476	39,594	2,726	14.5	360	–	–
2021	not published	2,777	8,695	7,265	614	11.8	382	–	–
2020	not published	12,293	38,331	38,324	2,466	15.5	321	–	–
2019	not published	12,296	38,338	35,483	2,978	11.9	347	–	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/m³·nm	LNG carrier median	vs LNG carrier	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	''K'' Line Energy Shipping (UK) Limited	7.74	7.12	+9%	220 of 386	DNV	B+C
2024Bio blend	K Line LNG Shipping UK Ltd.	8.54	7.39	+16%	186 of 312	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	13.6	9.10	+50%	296 of 355	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	14.2	10.4	+37%	285 of 379	DNV	A+C
2021	not published	6.22	10.5	−41%	43 of 289	DNV	A+C
2020	not published	9.72	10.7	−9%	109 of 267	DNV	A+C
2019	not published	11.8	10.9	+9%	146 of 248	DNV	A+C

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. LNG carrier ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (volume) (TW), in g CO₂/m³·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's LNG carrier ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.