Navalyze · Container · Ship

MACAO

IMO: 9362724
Type: Container ship
Average cargo carried: 10,132 t
Flag (estimated): Portugal
Port of registry: Madeira
Technical efficiency: EEXI 18.10 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: MACAO STRAIT

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: TB Marine Cont Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG

Report year

2020 at a glance

From the 2020 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 7,325 t of cargo on average.

Fuel kg/nm

109

Container median 172 kg/nm (−37%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

46.3

g CO₂/t·nm · Container median 17.6 (+164%)

Average speed

12.3 kn

Container median 14.0 kn (−12%)

Fuel per day at sea

32.3 t/day

Fuel consumed

6,741 t

CO₂ emitted

21,019 t

Distance sailed

61,925 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5,016 h

209 days, 57% of the year

Within the container fleet, 2025

Set against all 2,208 container ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel kg/nmThis ship 99.4 kg/nm · median 177 (−44%)

78.8Ranks 526 of 2,208, lowest first302

Average speedThis ship 8.6 kn · median 13.3 (−35%)

9.1Faster than 8% of container ships16.0

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 30.8 g CO₂/t·nm · median 16.3 (+89%)

7.22Ranks 1,707 of 2,208, lowest first46.9

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Container medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2020

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports13%
From the EU31%
Into the EU55%
At berth in the EU1%

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

227 t

1.1% of the ship's CO₂, alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

–

Mainly from LNG; small for oil, biofuel and methanol

CO₂eq uplift

–

CO₂eq on top of CO₂ alone, from CH₄ and N₂O

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Container median is the middle ship of all container ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel kg/nm

MACAO
Container median

75.0100.0125.0150.0175.0200.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

MACAO
Container median

8.010.012.014.016.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

MACAO
Container median

10.020.030.040.050.0

’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Average speed	Fuel kg/nm	Fuel per day at sea	Distance	CO₂ per transport work	Reading
2024→2025	−1.0 kn	+4%	−6%	+31%	+21%	1.0 kn slower, fuel per mile up 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+1.4 kn	−18%	−4%	+107%	−37%	1.4 kn faster, fuel per mile down 18%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−3.5 kn	+8%	−24%	−69%	+41%	3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 8%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2021→2022	−1.8 kn	−1%	−14%	−38%	−5%	1.8 kn slower, fuel per mile flat; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	+1.2 kn	−1%	+8%	+14%	−34%	1.2 kn faster, fuel per mile flat; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	Hours at seah	Average speedknots at sea	Fuel kg/nmthis ship	CO₂ per transport work (cargo)g/t·nm, this ship	Laden fuel
2025	TB Marine Cont Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	3,702	11,615	37,245	4,313	8.6	99.4	30.8	–
2024	TB Marine Cont Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	2,708	8,455	28,443	2,948	9.6	95.2	25.5	–
2023	not published	1,585	4,967	13,732	1,670	8.2	116	40.6	–
2022	not published	4,691	14,624	43,753	3,755	11.7	107	28.9	93%
2021	not published	7,615	24,011	70,576	5,234	13.5	108	30.5	96%
2020	not published	6,741	21,019	61,925	5,016	12.3	109	46.3	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Container median	vs Container	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	TB Marine Cont Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	30.8	16.3	+89%	1,707 of 2,208	DNV	B+C
2024	TB Marine Cont Shipmanagement GmbH & Co. KG	25.5	17.5	+46%	1,344 of 1,974	DNV	A+C
2023	not published	40.6	19.4	+109%	1,546 of 1,899	DNV	A+C
2022	not published	28.9	19.1	+51%	1,270 of 1,825	ABS	A+B
2021	not published	30.5	17.9	+70%	1,314 of 1,781	ABS	A+B
2020	not published	46.3	17.6	+164%	1,565 of 1,797	DNV	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Container ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's container ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.