Navalyze · Chemical tanker · Ship

SCOT FLENSBURG

IMO: 9365269
Type: Chemical tanker
Average cargo carried: 1,724 t
Port of registry: Majuro
Technical efficiency: EEXI 13.40 g CO₂/t·nm
Former names: RHL FLENSBURG

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: SCOT GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 1,724 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

31.1 kg/nm

Chemical tanker median 79.7 kg/nm (−61%)

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

57.54

g CO₂/t·nm · Chemical tanker median 15.04 (+283%)

Average speed

4.7 kn

Chemical tanker median 11.1 kn (−58%)

Fuel per day at sea

3.5 t/day

Fuel consumed

259 t

CO₂ emitted

824 t

837 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

8,308 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

1,772 h

74 days, 20% of the year

Within the chemical tanker fleet, 2025

Set against all 1,460 chemical tanker ships with a full-year 2025 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 31.1 kg/nm · median 79.7 (−61%)

52.8Ranks 4 of 1,460, lowest first111.0

Average speedThis ship 4.7 kn · median 11.1 (−58%)

8.8Faster than 1% of chemical tanker ships12.4

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 57.54 g CO₂/t·nm · median 15.04 (+283%)

7.93Ranks 1,412 of 1,460, lowest first40.17

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Chemical tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports52%
From the EU0%
Into the EU41%
At berth in the EU7%

79% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (654 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

6.6%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.016

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Chemical tanker median is the middle ship of all chemical tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

SCOT FLENSBURG
Chemical tanker median

20.040.060.080.0100.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

SCOT FLENSBURG
Chemical tanker median

2.55.07.510.012.515.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

SCOT FLENSBURG
Chemical tanker median

0.020.040.060.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−8.6 kn	+2%	−64%	+19%	+98%	8.6 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+2.2 kn	−31%	−18%	−52%	−6%	2.2 kn faster, fuel per mile down 31%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.7 kn	−9%	−14%	−6%	−12%	0.7 kn slower, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	+1.0 kn	−6%	+1%	−16%	+50%	1.0 kn faster, fuel per mile down 6%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2020→2021	−1.2 kn	−4%	−13%	−56%	−26%	1.2 kn slower, fuel per mile down 4%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2019→2020	+5.7 kn	−15%	+61%	+656%	+12%	5.7 kn faster, fuel per mile down 15%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−3.5 kn	+15%	−26%	−49%	−9%	3.5 kn slower, fuel per mile up 15%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).

Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025	SCOT GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.	259	824	8,308	1,772	4.7	31.1	57.54	–
2024	SCOT GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.	212	665	6,998	525	13.3	30.4	29.13	77%
2023	not published	642	2,014	14,584	1,309	11.1	44.0	31.07	73%
2022	not published	755	2,362	15,531	1,321	11.8	48.6	35.43	–
2021	not published	962	3,046	18,586	1,714	10.8	51.8	23.56	–
2020	not published	2,279	7,229	42,284	3,530	12.0	53.9	31.74	–
2019	not published	353	1,110	5,595	884	6.3	63.1	28.43	–
2018	not published	603	1,885	10,974	1,124	9.8	55.0	31.18	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Chemical tanker median	vs Chemical tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025	SCOT GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.	57.54	15.04	+283%	1,412 of 1,460	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2024	SCOT GEMI ISLETMECILIGI A.S.	29.13	16.73	+74%	972 of 1,274	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2023	not published	31.07	16.23	+91%	1,043 of 1,314	Polish Register of Shipping	B
2022	not published	35.43	16.06	+121%	1,210 of 1,409	Verifavia	B
2021	not published	23.56	16.69	+41%	944 of 1,343	EnvService	B
2020	not published	31.74	16.16	+96%	1,073 of 1,312	EnvService	B
2019	not published	28.43	17.32	+64%	1,018 of 1,321	EnvService	B
2018	not published	31.18	17.14	+82%	1,039 of 1,294	EnvService	B

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Chemical tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's chemical tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.