Navalyze · Oil tanker · Ship

EOS T

IMO: 9365477
Type: Oil tanker
Average cargo carried: 15,761 t
Port of registry: Panama
Technical efficiency: EIV 13.49 g CO₂/t·nm
Ice class: IA
Former names: PATERNA, NORSIGN BREEZE

ISM company (DoC holder) in 2025: IMZA MARINE DENIZCILIK AS

Report year

2025 at a glance

From the 2025 THETIS-MRV report. Carries about 15,761 t of cargo on average.

Fuel per mile

1,998.9 kg/nm

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)

400

g CO₂/t·nm

Average speed

1.8 kn

Fuel per day at sea

88.1 t/day

Fuel consumed

18 t

CO₂ emitted

57 t

58 t CO₂eq incl. CH₄ and N₂O

Distance sailed

9 nm

CO₂ ÷ CO₂ per mile

Time at sea

5 h

0 days, 0% of the year

Within the oil tanker fleet, 2024

Set against all 1,787 oil tanker ships with a full-year 2024 report. Bigger ships burn more per mile but less per tonne of cargo, so read fuel per mile with the ship's size in mind.

Fuel per mileThis ship 83.3 kg/nm · median 129.0 (−35%)

79.5Ranks 229 of 1,787, lowest first193.6

Average speedThis ship 9.6 kn · median 10.9 (−12%)

8.1Faster than 22% of oil tanker ships12.3

CO₂ per transport work (cargo)This ship 33.97 g CO₂/t·nm · median 8.06 (+321%)

4.44Ranks 1,678 of 1,787, lowest first25.70

Middle 80% of shipsMiddle 50%Oil tanker medianThis ship

Where the emissions happen, 2025

THETIS splits each ship's CO₂ by voyage type. The split sets how much falls under the EU ETS: all of it within the EU and at berth, half of it on voyages into or out of the EU.

Between EU ports0%
From the EU100%
Into the EU0%
At berth in the EU0%

0% of this ship's CO₂ falls under the EU ETS (0 t).

Fuel burned laden

–

Not reported

CO₂ at berth

0.0%

Alongside in EU ports

Methane (CH₄)

0.0 t

Mainly from LNG; small for oil

CO₂eq ÷ CO₂

1.018

Uplift from CH₄ and N₂O, counted in full from 2026

Over the years

Full-year reports only. The Oil tanker median is the middle ship of all oil tanker ships reporting that year; it moves with the fleet, so a ship can gain on it without changing itself.

Fuel per mile, kg/nm

EOS T
Oil tanker median

0.0500.01,0001,5002,000

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

Average speed, kn

EOS T
Oil tanker median

0.02.55.07.510.012.5

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024’252025

CO₂ per transport work (cargo), g CO₂/t·nm

EOS T
Oil tanker median

0.010.020.030.040.0

’182018’192019’202020’212021’222022’232023’242024

Year on year

Year	Speed	Fuel per mile	Fuel per day	Distance	CO₂ per TW	Reading
2024→2025	−7.8 kn	+2,300%	+359%	−100%	–	7.8 kn slower, fuel per mile up 2,300%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2023→2024	+0.4 kn	+3%	+8%	+23%	+7%	0.4 kn faster, fuel per mile up 3%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2022→2023	−0.2 kn	−9%	−12%	+2%	−5%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 9%; in line with the speed change.
2021→2022	−0.4 kn	+16%	+11%	−29%	−15%	0.4 kn slower, fuel per mile up 16%; worse than speed alone explains (fouling, weather, loading or trade).
2020→2021	−0.3 kn	−14%	−16%	−7%	+23%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 14%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2019→2020	+4.8 kn	+7%	+103%	+30%	−3%	4.8 kn faster, fuel per mile up 7%; better than speed alone explains (hull, engine or trade).
2018→2019	−0.2 kn	−10%	−13%	−4%	−12%	Same speed, fuel per mile down 10%; in line with the speed change.

Part-year reports are left out of these comparisons. Fuel per mile rises roughly with the square of speed for a given ship, so a change in speed explains much of a change in fuel per mile.

Every reporting year

One row per THETIS-MRV report. A ship that changed operator during a year has a part-year report for each.

Operation

Year	ISM company	Fuel t	CO₂ t	Distance nm	At sea h	Speed kn	Fuel kg/nm	CO₂ g/t·nm	Laden fuel
2025part-year	IMZA MARINE DENIZCILIK AS	18	57	9	5	1.8	1,998.9	400.28	–
2025	AETHER TANKER VE DENIZCILIK AS	18	57	9	5	1.8	1,998.9	400.28	–
2024part-year	HPS GmbH & Co. KG “PATERNA”	1,513	4,831	16,548	1,549	10.7	91.4	35.83	–
2024	IMZA MARINE DENIZCILIK AS	2,669	8,491	32,055	3,330	9.6	83.3	33.97	–
2023	not published	2,097	6,723	26,027	2,842	9.2	80.6	31.79	–
2022	not published	2,251	7,208	25,421	2,702	9.4	88.5	33.31	–
2021	not published	2,753	8,712	35,963	3,678	9.8	76.6	39.00	–
2020	not published	3,450	10,850	38,779	3,856	10.1	89.0	31.76	–
2019	not published	2,466	7,790	29,782	5,601	5.3	82.8	32.64	–
2018	not published	2,857	8,996	30,945	5,610	5.5	92.3	37.05	–

Benchmark and verification

Year	ISM company	CO₂ per TW, g CO₂/t·nm	Oil tanker median	vs Oil tanker	Rank	Verifier	Methods
2025part-year	IMZA MARINE DENIZCILIK AS	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	A+B
2025	AETHER TANKER VE DENIZCILIK AS	–	–	–	–	Lloyd's Register	A
2024part-year	HPS GmbH & Co. KG “PATERNA”	–	–	–	–	Swiss Climate	A
2024	IMZA MARINE DENIZCILIK AS	33.97	8.06	+321%	1,678 of 1,787	Lloyd's Register	A
2023	not published	31.79	8.44	+277%	1,669 of 1,797	Swiss Climate	A
2022	not published	33.31	16.06	+107%	1,179 of 1,409	Swiss Climate	A
2021	not published	39.00	16.69	+134%	1,185 of 1,343	Swiss Climate	A
2020	not published	31.76	16.16	+97%	1,075 of 1,312	Swiss Climate	A
2019	not published	32.64	17.32	+88%	1,077 of 1,321	Swiss Climate	A
2018	not published	37.05	17.14	+116%	1,100 of 1,294	Swiss Climate	A

Fuel per mile and CO₂ per tonne-mile are the ship's own reported KPIs. Oil tanker ships are benchmarked on CO₂ per transport work (cargo) (TW), in g CO₂/t·nm. CO₂eq adds methane and nitrous oxide and is in the public files from 2024. Rank counts from the lowest figure among that year's oil tanker ships. Methods: A delivery notes, B tank monitoring, C flow meters, D direct measurement. FuelEU GHG intensity is not shown: it needs fuel types, which the public file does not carry. Operators are named only from 2024, the first year the public files carry them; earlier years belong to the ship, not to any company.